CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-HIN-22-004
Dependence of two-particle azimuthal correlations on the forward rapidity gap width in pPb collisions at $ \sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}= $ 8.16 TeV
Abstract: Measurements of the Fourier coefficients ($ V_{n\Delta} $) of the azimuthal distributions of charged hadron pairs produced in pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV are presented as functions of the forward rapidity gap width ($ \Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} $) for events in which particle production is concentrated in the direction of the outgoing Pb beam. The sample includes contributions from pomeron and photon induced processes as well as nondiffractive events. The data correspond to a luminosity of 174.5 nb$^{-1}$ recorded with the CMS detector in the LHC Run 2. The mean track multiplicity decreases by 53% from the bin 0 $ \leq\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} < $ 0.5 to that with $ \Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} > $ 2.5. The dependence of the results on the track multiplicity and the transverse momentum of the charged particles is also studied for the most forward events ($ \Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} > $ 2.5). The measured values of $ V_{1\Delta} $ are negative and decrease with $ \Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} $, while those of $ V_{2\Delta} $ are positive for the $ \Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} $ bins $ [0.5,1) $, $ [1,1.5) $, $ [2,2.5) $, and are consistent with zero elsewhere. The measured values of the elliptic flow coefficient ($ v_2 $) is provided for the $ \Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} $ bins $ [0.5,1) $, $ [1,1.5) $, $ [2,2.5) $. In the other bins, the $ v_2 $ results are consistent with zero. In these bins, upper limits at 95% C.L. are determined, ranging up to 0.13 for the most inclusive category. The values of the upper limits are similar to the values of $ v_2 $ measured in $ \gamma $p collisions with comparable multiplicity.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Sketch of a single-diffractive pPb event (left). The interaction proceeds via the exchange of a pomeron ($\text{ IP} $); the proton remains intact or dissociates into a low-mass state, and the nucleus breaks up (X). A single-diffractive event as seen in the detector (right). Activity is observed only in one side of the detector and a large forward rapidity gap ($ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $) is present. Both diagrams are extracted from [47].

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Sketch of a single-diffractive pPb event (left). The interaction proceeds via the exchange of a pomeron ($\text{ IP} $); the proton remains intact or dissociates into a low-mass state, and the nucleus breaks up (X). A single-diffractive event as seen in the detector (right). Activity is observed only in one side of the detector and a large forward rapidity gap ($ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $) is present. Both diagrams are extracted from [47].

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Sketch of a single-diffractive pPb event (left). The interaction proceeds via the exchange of a pomeron ($\text{ IP} $); the proton remains intact or dissociates into a low-mass state, and the nucleus breaks up (X). A single-diffractive event as seen in the detector (right). Activity is observed only in one side of the detector and a large forward rapidity gap ($ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $) is present. Both diagrams are extracted from [47].

png pdf
Figure 2:
$ N_{\mathrm{trk}}^{\mathrm{offline}} $ spectra for inclusive pPb events (labeled pPb, from Ref. [45]) and events from the nominal sample in different $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $ bins.

png pdf
Figure 3:
$ N_{\mathrm{trk}}^{\mathrm{offline}} $ spectra for inclusive pPb events (labelled pPb, from Ref. [45]) and diffraction enhanced events. The distribution for the diffraction enhanced events (black data points) is the same as that shown in orange in Fig. 2 ($ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } > $ 2.5). Predictions based on EPOS-LHC are also shown. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to MC yields.

png pdf
Figure 4:
2D correlation distribution for multiplicity (left) and its projection on the $ {\Delta\phi} $ axis for $ |{\Delta\eta}| > $ 2, 2 $ \leq N_{\mathrm{trk}}^{\mathrm{offline}} < $ 40, and 0.3 $ < \mathrm{p^{trig}_T} < $ 3 GeV (right). The one-dimensional $ {\Delta\phi} $ distributions are symmetrized by construction around $ {\Delta\phi} = $ 0 and $ {\Delta\phi} = \pi $, so all the data are contained in [0, $ \pi $] and are averaged over $ |{\Delta\eta}| > $ 2. The Fourier coefficients $ {V_{n\Delta}} $ are fitted over the $ {\Delta\phi} $ range [0, $ \pi $].

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
2D correlation distribution for multiplicity (left) and its projection on the $ {\Delta\phi} $ axis for $ |{\Delta\eta}| > $ 2, 2 $ \leq N_{\mathrm{trk}}^{\mathrm{offline}} < $ 40, and 0.3 $ < \mathrm{p^{trig}_T} < $ 3 GeV (right). The one-dimensional $ {\Delta\phi} $ distributions are symmetrized by construction around $ {\Delta\phi} = $ 0 and $ {\Delta\phi} = \pi $, so all the data are contained in [0, $ \pi $] and are averaged over $ |{\Delta\eta}| > $ 2. The Fourier coefficients $ {V_{n\Delta}} $ are fitted over the $ {\Delta\phi} $ range [0, $ \pi $].

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
2D correlation distribution for multiplicity (left) and its projection on the $ {\Delta\phi} $ axis for $ |{\Delta\eta}| > $ 2, 2 $ \leq N_{\mathrm{trk}}^{\mathrm{offline}} < $ 40, and 0.3 $ < \mathrm{p^{trig}_T} < $ 3 GeV (right). The one-dimensional $ {\Delta\phi} $ distributions are symmetrized by construction around $ {\Delta\phi} = $ 0 and $ {\Delta\phi} = \pi $, so all the data are contained in [0, $ \pi $] and are averaged over $ |{\Delta\eta}| > $ 2. The Fourier coefficients $ {V_{n\Delta}} $ are fitted over the $ {\Delta\phi} $ range [0, $ \pi $].

png pdf
Figure 5:
Summary of measurements of $ V_{1\Delta} $ (left) and $ V_{2\Delta} $ (right) as a function of $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $. The results are for tracks with 0.3 $ < \mathrm{p^{trig}_T} < $ 3 GeV. The $ {2} $ in the $ V_{n\Delta} $ variable name means that it was measured from the correlations from particle pairs. The filled circles indicate the data. The open triangles indicate the simulation, in blue for PYTHIA 8.3 and red for EPOS-LHC. The data points are plotted at the center of the corresponding $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $ bin. The shaded bands indicate the size of the systematic uncertainties. The vertical lines indicate the size of the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Summary of measurements of $ V_{1\Delta} $ (left) and $ V_{2\Delta} $ (right) as a function of $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $. The results are for tracks with 0.3 $ < \mathrm{p^{trig}_T} < $ 3 GeV. The $ {2} $ in the $ V_{n\Delta} $ variable name means that it was measured from the correlations from particle pairs. The filled circles indicate the data. The open triangles indicate the simulation, in blue for PYTHIA 8.3 and red for EPOS-LHC. The data points are plotted at the center of the corresponding $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $ bin. The shaded bands indicate the size of the systematic uncertainties. The vertical lines indicate the size of the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Summary of measurements of $ V_{1\Delta} $ (left) and $ V_{2\Delta} $ (right) as a function of $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $. The results are for tracks with 0.3 $ < \mathrm{p^{trig}_T} < $ 3 GeV. The $ {2} $ in the $ V_{n\Delta} $ variable name means that it was measured from the correlations from particle pairs. The filled circles indicate the data. The open triangles indicate the simulation, in blue for PYTHIA 8.3 and red for EPOS-LHC. The data points are plotted at the center of the corresponding $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $ bin. The shaded bands indicate the size of the systematic uncertainties. The vertical lines indicate the size of the statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Summary of measurements of $ V_{1\Delta} $ (left) and $ V_{2\Delta} $ (right) for the diffraction enhanced events for different classes of $ N_{\mathrm{ch}}^{|\eta | < 2.4,p_{\rm{T}} > 0.3} $. The results are for tracks with 0.3 $ < \mathrm{p^{trig}_T} < $ 3 GeV. The $ {2} $ in the $ V_{n\Delta} $ variable name means that it was measured from the correlations from particle pairs. The filled circles indicate the data. The open triangles indicate the simulation, in blue for PYTHIA 8.3 and red for EPOS-LHC. The data points are plotted at the mean of $ N_{\mathrm{ch}}^{|\eta | < 2.4,p_{\rm{T}} > 0.3} $ within the corresponding $ N_{\mathrm{trk}}^{\mathrm{offline}} $ bin. The shaded bands indicate the size of the systematic uncertainties. The vertical lines indicate the size of the statistical uncertainties. The inclusive pPb and $ \gamma $p results from Ref. [45] are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Summary of measurements of $ V_{1\Delta} $ (left) and $ V_{2\Delta} $ (right) for the diffraction enhanced events for different classes of $ N_{\mathrm{ch}}^{|\eta | < 2.4,p_{\rm{T}} > 0.3} $. The results are for tracks with 0.3 $ < \mathrm{p^{trig}_T} < $ 3 GeV. The $ {2} $ in the $ V_{n\Delta} $ variable name means that it was measured from the correlations from particle pairs. The filled circles indicate the data. The open triangles indicate the simulation, in blue for PYTHIA 8.3 and red for EPOS-LHC. The data points are plotted at the mean of $ N_{\mathrm{ch}}^{|\eta | < 2.4,p_{\rm{T}} > 0.3} $ within the corresponding $ N_{\mathrm{trk}}^{\mathrm{offline}} $ bin. The shaded bands indicate the size of the systematic uncertainties. The vertical lines indicate the size of the statistical uncertainties. The inclusive pPb and $ \gamma $p results from Ref. [45] are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Summary of measurements of $ V_{1\Delta} $ (left) and $ V_{2\Delta} $ (right) for the diffraction enhanced events for different classes of $ N_{\mathrm{ch}}^{|\eta | < 2.4,p_{\rm{T}} > 0.3} $. The results are for tracks with 0.3 $ < \mathrm{p^{trig}_T} < $ 3 GeV. The $ {2} $ in the $ V_{n\Delta} $ variable name means that it was measured from the correlations from particle pairs. The filled circles indicate the data. The open triangles indicate the simulation, in blue for PYTHIA 8.3 and red for EPOS-LHC. The data points are plotted at the mean of $ N_{\mathrm{ch}}^{|\eta | < 2.4,p_{\rm{T}} > 0.3} $ within the corresponding $ N_{\mathrm{trk}}^{\mathrm{offline}} $ bin. The shaded bands indicate the size of the systematic uncertainties. The vertical lines indicate the size of the statistical uncertainties. The inclusive pPb and $ \gamma $p results from Ref. [45] are also shown.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Measured values of $ V_{n\Delta} $ as a function of $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $. The uncertainties include both statistical and systematic components. The table shows the $ v_2 $ results when they are non-zero. For the rest of the cases, upper limits at 95% C.L. are displayed with the $ \leq $ symbol.

png pdf
Table 2:
Measured values of $ V_{n\Delta} $ for the diffractive-enhanced sample as a function of $ \langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}^{|\eta | < 2.4,p_{\rm{T}} > 0.3} \rangle $ and $ N_{\mathrm{trk}}^{\mathrm{offline}} $ for both $ \mathrm{p^{trig}_T} $ bins. The uncertainties include both statistical and systematic components. The table also shows the 95% C.L. upper limits on $ v_2 $ displayed with the $ \leq $ symbol. In the lower table, $ v_2 $ values for $ \gamma $p events for 0.3 $ < \mathrm{p^{trig}_T} < $ 3 GeV [45] in similar $ N_{\mathrm{ch}}^{|\eta | < 2.4,p_{\rm{T}} > 0.3} $ ranges are given.
Summary
Long-range azimuthal two-particle correlations have been searched for in proton-lead (pPb) events at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $=8.16 TeV as a function of the forward rapidity gap width ($ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $) and the charged particle multiplicity ($ N_{\mathrm{ch}}^{|\eta | < 2.4,p_{\rm{T}} > 0.3} $). Events have been selected by requiring an asymmetric distribution of energy in the forward and backward calorimeters, and no energy deposition in the region 2.5 $ < \eta < $ 3, so that activity is only present in the direction of the outgoing Pb beam. A separate set of measurements with a selection that enhances the fraction of diffractive events has also been carried out by requiring $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } > $ 2.5. The average track multiplicity is lower in the diffractive sample than for inclusive proton-lead (pPb) events, but larger than for photon-proton ($ \gamma $p) events. The slope of the multiplicity distribution becomes steeper with increasing $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $. The mean track multiplicity $ \langle N_{\mathrm{trk}}^{\mathrm{offline}} \rangle $ decreases by 53% when $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $ changes from 0 $ \leq{\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } < $ 0.5 to $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } > $ 2.5. The two-dimensional two-particle correlation functions have been averaged over $ |{\Delta\eta}| > $ 2 and the resulting $ {\Delta\phi} $ distributions have been studied in terms of its Fourier coefficients $ V_{1\Delta} $ and $ V_{2\Delta} $. The measured values of $ V_{1\Delta} $ are negative and decrease with $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $, while those of $ V_{2\Delta} $ are positive for the $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $ bins $ [0.5,1) $, $ [1,1.5) $, $ [2,2.5) $, and are consistent with zero elsewhere. The results have been compared with the predictions of the PYTHIA 8.3 Monte Carlo simulation, which does not include collective effects, and with EPOS-LHC simulation, which includes such effects. The measured values of the elliptic flow coefficient ($ v_2 $) are provided for the bins $ [0.5,1) $, $ [1,1.5) $, $ [2,2.5) $. In the other bins, the $ v_2 $ results are consistent with zero. In these bins, 95% confidence level upper limits have been determined; they are stable across the $ {\Delta\eta^{\rm{F}} } $ and $ N_{\mathrm{ch}}^{|\eta | < 2.4,p_{\rm{T}} > 0.3} $ regions studied, and range up to 0.13 for the most inclusive $ N_{\mathrm{trk}}^{\mathrm{offline}} $ bin. The values of the upper limits are similar to the values measured in $ \gamma $p events for comparable $ N_{\mathrm{ch}}^{|\eta | < 2.4,p_{\rm{T}} > 0.3} $ and $ \mathrm{p^{trig}_T} $ ranges.
References
1 CMS Collaboration Observation of long-range, near-side angular correlations in proton-proton collisions at the LHC JHEP 09 (2010) 091 CMS-QCD-10-002
1009.4122
2 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of long-range elliptic azimuthal anisotropies in $ \sqrt{s}= $13 and 2.76 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector PRL 116 (2016) 172301 1509.04776
3 CMS Collaboration Measurement of long-range near-side two-particle angular correlations in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRL 116 (2015) 172302 CMS-FSQ-15-002
1510.03068
4 CMS Collaboration Evidence for collectivity in pp collisions at the LHC PLB 765 (2017) 193 CMS-HIN-16-010
1606.06198
5 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of azimuthal anisotropy of muons from charm and bottom hadrons in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRL 124 (2020) 082301 1909.01650
6 PHENIX Collaboration Measurement of long-range angular correlations and azimuthal anisotropies in high-multiplicity pAu collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 200 GeV Phys. Rev. C 95 (2017) 034910 1609.02894
7 PHENIX Collaboration Creation of quark-gluon plasma droplets with three distinct geometries Nature Phys. 15 (2019) 214 1805.02973
8 CMS Collaboration Observation of long-range near-side angular correlations in pPb collisions at the LHC PLB 718 (2013) 795 CMS-HIN-12-015
1210.5482
9 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of associated near-side and away-side long-range correlations in $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 5.02 TeV proton-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector PRL 110 (2013) 182302 1212.5198
10 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement with the ATLAS detector of multi-particle azimuthal correlations in pPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 5.02 TeV PLB 725 (2013) 60 1303.2084
11 ALICE Collaboration Long-range angular correlations on the near and away side in $ p- $Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 5.02 TeV PLB 719 (2013) 29 1212.2001
12 LHCb Collaboration Measurements of long-range near-side angular correlations in $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 5 TeV proton-lead collisions in the forward region PLB 762 (2016) 473 1512.00439
13 ALICE Collaboration Long-range angular correlations of $ \pi $, K and p in pPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 5.02 TeV PLB 726 (2013) 164 1307.3237
14 CMS Collaboration Evidence for collective multiparticle correlations in p-Pb collisions PRL 115 (2015) 012301 CMS-HIN-14-006
1502.05382
15 CMS Collaboration Long-range two-particle correlations of strange hadrons with charged particles in pPb and PbPb collisions at LHC energies PLB 742 (2015) 200 CMS-HIN-14-002
1409.3392
16 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of multi-particle azimuthal correlations in pp, pPb and low multiplicity PbPb collisions with the ATLAS detector Eur. Phys. J. C. 77 (2017) 428 1705.04176
17 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of long-range multiparticle azimuthal correlations with the subevent cumulant method in pp and pPb collisions with the ATLAS detector at the CERN large hadron collider Phys. Rev. C 97 (2018) 024904 1708.03559
18 CMS Collaboration Studies of charm and beauty hadron long-range correlations in pp and pPb collisions at LHC energies PLB 813 (2021) 136036 CMS-HIN-19-009
2009.07065
19 STAR Collaboration Elliptic flow in AuAu collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 130 GeV PRL 86 (2001) 402 nucl-ex/0009011
20 PHOBOS Collaboration System size dependence of cluster properties from two-particle angular correlations in CuCu and AuAu collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 200 GeV Phys. Rev. C 81 (2010) 024904 0812.1172
21 CMS Collaboration Long-range and short-range dihadron angular correlations in central PbPb collisions at a nucleon-nucleon center of mass energy of 2.76 TeV JHEP 10 (2011) 076 CMS-HIN-11-001
1105.2438
22 CMS Collaboration Centrality dependence of dihadron correlations and azimuthal anisotropy harmonics in PbPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 2.76 TeV EPJC 72 (2012) 2012 CMS-HIN-11-006
1201.3158
23 STAR Collaboration Long range rapidity correlations and jet production in high energy nuclear collisions Phys. Rev. C 80 (2009) 064912 0909.0191
24 STAR Collaboration Three-particle coincidence of the long range pseudorapidity correlation in high energy nucleus-nucleus collisions PRL 105 (2010) 022301 0912.3977
25 PHENIX Collaboration Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC: experimental evaluation by the PHENIX collaboration Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 184 nucl-ex/0410003
26 STAR Collaboration Beam-energy dependence of identified two-particle angular correlations in $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 7.7--200 GeV AuAu collisions Phys. Rev. C 101 (2020) 014916 1906.09204
27 STAR Collaboration Correlation measurements between flow harmonics in AuAu collisions at RHIC PLB 783 (2018) 459 1803.03876
28 S. Voloshin and Y. Zhang Flow study in relativistic nuclear collisions by fourier expansion of azimuthal particle distributions Phys. Rev. C. 70 (1996) 665 hep-ph/9407282
29 B. Alver and G. Roland Collision geometry fluctuations and triangular flow in heavy-ion collisions [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 82, 039903 ()], 2010
Phys. Rev. C 81 (2010) 054905
1003.0194
30 B. H. Alver, C. Gombeaud, M. Luzum, and J.-Y. Ollitrault Triangular flow in hydrodynamics and transport theory Phys. Rev. C 82 (2010) 034913 1007.5469
31 C. G. B. Schenke, S. Jeon Elliptic and triangular flow in event-by-event D=3+1 viscous hydrodynamics Phys. Rev. Lett 106 (2011) 042301 1009.3244
32 C. S. Z. Qiu and U. Heinz Hydrodynamic elliptic and triangular flow in Pb-Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 2.76 TeV PLB 707 (2012) 151 1110.3033
33 CMS Collaboration Elliptic flow of charm and strange hadrons in high-multiplicity pPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 8.16 TeV PRL 121 (2018) 082301 CMS-HIN-17-003
1804.09767
34 CMS Collaboration Centrality and pseudorapidity dependence of the transverse energy density in pPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 5.02 TeV Phys. Rev. C 100 (2019) 024902 CMS-HIN-14-014
1810.05745
35 ALICE Collaboration Multi-strange baryon production in pPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 5.02 TeV PLB 758 (2016) 389 1512.07227
36 PHENIX Collaboration Elliptic flow of identified hadrons in AuAu collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 200 GeV PRL 91 (2003) 182301 nucl-ex/0305013
37 STAR Collaboration Distributions of charged hadrons associated with high transverse momentum particles in pp and AuAu collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ = 200 GeV PRL 95 (2005) 152301 nucl-ex/0501016
38 Belle Collaboration Measurement of two-particle correlations of hadrons in e+e- collisions at Belle PRL 128 (2022) 142005 2201.01694
39 K. Dusling, W. Li, and B. Schenke Novel collective phenomena in high-energy proton--proton and proton--nucleus collisions Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 25 (2016) 1630002 1509.07939
40 J. L. Nagle and J. Orjuela Koop A quasiparticle transport explanation for collectivity in the smallest of collision systems (pp and e$ ^{+} $e$ ^{-} $) Nucl. Phys. A 982 (2019) 455 1807.04619
41 A. Badea et al. Measurements of two-particle correlations in $ e^+e^- $ collisions at 91 GeV with ALEPH archived data PRL 123 (2019) 212002 1906.00489
42 Y.-C. Chen et al. Long-range near-side correlation in $ e^+e^- $ collisions at 183-209 GeV with ALEPH archived data 2312.05084
43 ZEUS Collaboration Two-particle azimuthal correlations as a probe of collective behaviour in deep inelastic $ ep $ scattering at HERA JHEP 04 (2020) 070 1912.07431
44 ATLAS Collaboration Two-particle azimuthal correlations in photonuclear ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV with ATLAS Phys. Rev. C 104 (2021) 014903 2101.10771
45 CMS Collaboration Two-particle azimuthal correlations in \ensuremath\gammap interactions using pPb collisions at sNN=8.16TeV PLB 844 (2023) 137905 CMS-HIN-18-008
2204.13486
46 CMS Collaboration Observation of enhanced long-range elliptic anisotropies inside high-multiplicity jets in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV Phys. Rev. Lett (12, ) . Submitted to \emphPhys. Rev. Lett, 2023 CMS-HIN-21-013
2312.17103
47 CMS Collaboration First measurement of the forward rapidity gap distribution in pPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} $ =8.16\,\,TeV PRD 108 (2023) 092004 CMS-HIN-18-019
2301.07630
48 T. Pierog et al. EPOS LHC: test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN large hadron collider Phys. Rev. C 92 (2015) 034906 1306.0121
49 CMS Collaboration CMS technical design report for the phase 1 upgrade of the hadron calorimeter link
50 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
51 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
52 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement using 2016 proton-nucleus collisions at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of 8.16 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-002
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-002
53 CMS Collaboration Observation of correlated azimuthal anisotropy fourier harmonics in pp and pPb collisions at the LHC PRL 120 (2018) 092301 CMS-HIN-16-022
1709.09189
54 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
55 C. Bierlich et al. A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3 SciPost Phys. Codeb. 2022 (2022) 8 2203.11601
56 \GEANTfour Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
57 C. Bierlich, G. Gustafson, L. L\"onnblad, and H. Shah The Angantyr model for heavy-ion collisions in PYTHIA8 JHEP 10 (2018) 134 1806.10820
58 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
59 CMS Collaboration Measurement of Tracking Efficiency Technical Report , CERN, Geneva, 2010
CMS-PAS-TRK-10-002
60 R. Barlow Systematic errors: facts and fictions in Conference on Advanced Statistical Techniques in Particle Physics, p--144. 7, 2002 hep-ex/0207026
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN