CMS-PAS-FTR-18-036

CMS-PAS-FTR-18-036
Anomalous couplings in the ttZ final state at the HL-LHC
CMS Collaboration
December 2018

Abstract: The electroweak couplings of the top quark provide a crucial window to physics beyond the standard model and can be put to stringent tests with the CERN High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC). The expected sensitivity of the CMS detector for anomalous electroweak top quark interactions based on differential cross section measurements of the ttZ process in the three lepton final state is provided for a HL-LHC scenario with 3000 fb $^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 14 TeV.
Links: CDS record (PDF) ; inSPIRE record ; CADI line (restricted) ;

Figures & Tables	Summary	Additional Figures & Tables	References	CMS Publications

Figures
png pdf	Figure 1: Representative Feynman diagram for the ttZ process.
png pdf	Figure 2: Differential cross sections with respect to ${ {p_\textrm {T}} ({\mathrm {Z}})}$ (left) and $\cos\theta ^\ast _{{\mathrm {Z}}}$ (right) in the ttZ ( ${N_{\textrm {lep}}}=$ 3) channel as specified in Table 2 and for the Phase-2 scenario. For $\cos\theta ^\ast _{{\mathrm {Z}}}$ , an additional requirement of ${ {p_\textrm {T}} ({\mathrm {Z}})} >$ 200 GeV is applied. The SM distributions are shown in black with systematic uncertainties, while colored lines show hypotheses for ${C_\text {tZ}}$ =2 ( $\Lambda$ /TeV) $^2$ and ${C_\text {tZ}^\text {[Im]}} =$ 2 ( $\Lambda$ /TeV) $^2$ , with yields that are area-normalized to the SM distribution. The non-informative contribution to ttZ is described in Sec. 4 and shown hatched. Backgrounds are shown in solid colors.
png pdf	Figure 2-a: Differential cross sections with respect to ${ {p_\textrm {T}} ({\mathrm {Z}})}$ in the ttZ ( ${N_{\textrm {lep}}}=$ 3) channel as specified in Table 2 and for the Phase-2 scenario. For $\cos\theta ^\ast _{{\mathrm {Z}}}$ , an additional requirement of ${ {p_\textrm {T}} ({\mathrm {Z}})} >$ 200 GeV is applied. The SM distributions are shown in black with systematic uncertainties, while colored lines show hypotheses for ${C_\text {tZ}}$ =2 ( $\Lambda$ /TeV) $^2$ and ${C_\text {tZ}^\text {[Im]}} =$ 2 ( $\Lambda$ /TeV) $^2$ , with yields that are area-normalized to the SM distribution. The non-informative contribution to ttZ is described in Sec. 4 and shown hatched. Backgrounds are shown in solid colors.
png pdf	Figure 2-b: Differential cross sections with respect to $\cos\theta ^\ast _{{\mathrm {Z}}}$ in the ttZ ( ${N_{\textrm {lep}}}=$ 3) channel as specified in Table 2 and for the Phase-2 scenario. For $\cos\theta ^\ast _{{\mathrm {Z}}}$ , an additional requirement of ${ {p_\textrm {T}} ({\mathrm {Z}})} >$ 200 GeV is applied. The SM distributions are shown in black with systematic uncertainties, while colored lines show hypotheses for ${C_\text {tZ}}$ =2 ( $\Lambda$ /TeV) $^2$ and ${C_\text {tZ}^\text {[Im]}} =$ 2 ( $\Lambda$ /TeV) $^2$ , with yields that are area-normalized to the SM distribution. The non-informative contribution to ttZ is described in Sec. 4 and shown hatched. Backgrounds are shown in solid colors.
png pdf	Figure 3: Signal region yields from simulation for SM processes (colored histograms). The yields are estimated for an integrated luminosity of 3/ab, the cross section is scaled to 14 TeV. The total SM yield is shown with the black line, the dashed red line reflects the total expected yield assuming modified couplings, with the chosen value ${C_\text {tZ}} =$ 2 ( $\Lambda$ /TeV) $^2$ . The hatched area represents the non-informative contribution to ttZ as described in Sec. 4.
png pdf	Figure 4: Individual likelihood ratio for the Wilson coefficients ${C_{\phi t}}$ and ${C_{\phi Q}^{-}}$ (top) and ${C_\text {tZ}}$ and ${C_\text {tZ}^\text {[Im]}}$ (bottom) for the ttZ process. Here, only one Wilson coefficient at a time is considered non-zero. The 68% (95%) CL intervals are given in green (red).
png pdf	Figure 4-a: Individual likelihood ratio for the Wilson coefficients ${C_{\phi t}}$ for the ttZ process. Other Wilson coefficients are set to zero. The 68% (95%) CL interval is given in green (red).
png pdf	Figure 4-b: Individual likelihood ratio for the Wilson coefficients ${C_{\phi Q}^{-}}$ for the ttZ process. Other Wilson coefficients are set to zero. The 68% (95%) CL interval is given in green (red).
png pdf	Figure 4-c: Individual likelihood ratio for the Wilson coefficients ${C_\text {tZ}}$ for the ttZ process. Other Wilson coefficients are set to zero. The 68% (95%) CL interval is given in green (red).
png pdf	Figure 4-d: Individual likelihood ratio for the Wilson coefficients ${C_\text {tZ}^\text {[Im]}}$ for the ttZ process. Other Wilson coefficients are set to zero. The 68% (95%) CL interval is given in green (red).
png pdf	Figure 5: Individual profiled likelihood ratio for the Wilson coefficients ${C_{\phi t}}$ and ${C_{\phi Q}^{-}}$ (top) and ${C_\text {tZ}}$ and ${C_\text {tZ}^\text {[Im]}}$ (bottom) for the ttZ process under the SM hypothesis. The 68% (95%) CL intervals are given in green (red).
png pdf	Figure 5-a: Individual profiled likelihood ratio for the Wilson coefficients ${C_{\phi t}}$ for the ttZ process under the SM hypothesis. The 68% (95%) CL intervals are given in green (red).
png pdf	Figure 5-b: Individual profiled likelihood ratio for the Wilson coefficients ${C_{\phi Q}^{-}}$ for the ttZ process under the SM hypothesis. The 68% (95%) CL intervals are given in green (red).
png pdf	Figure 5-c: Individual profiled likelihood ratio for the Wilson coefficients ${C_\text {tZ}}$ for the ttZ process under the SM hypothesis. The 68% (95%) CL intervals are given in green (red).
png pdf	Figure 5-d: Individual profiled likelihood ratio for the Wilson coefficients ${C_\text {tZ}^\text {[Im]}}$ for the ttZ process under the SM hypothesis. The 68% (95%) CL intervals are given in green (red).
png pdf	Figure 6: Scan of the negative likelihood in the ${C_{\phi Q}^{-}} / {C_{\phi t}}$ (left) and ${C_\text {tZ}} / {C_\text {tZ}^\text {[Im]}}$ parameter planes (right) for the ttZ process under the SM hypothesis. The 68% (95%) CL contour lines are given in green (red).
png pdf	Figure 6-a: Scan of the negative likelihood in the ${C_{\phi Q}^{-}} / {C_{\phi t}}$ parameter plane for the ttZ process under the SM hypothesis. The 68% (95%) CL contour lines are given in green (red).
png pdf	Figure 6-b: Scan of the negative likelihood in the ${C_\text {tZ}} / {C_\text {tZ}^\text {[Im]}}$ parameter plane for the ttZ process under the SM hypothesis. The 68% (95%) CL contour lines are given in green (red).

Tables
png pdf	Table 1: Simulated processes with a Monte-Carlo sample size of one million events, the cross section for $\sqrt {s}=13 TeV$ and the scale factor for $\sqrt {s}=$ 14 TeV . Here, $\ell =$ e, $\mu$ , $\tau$ and $\nu _\ell =\nu _e$ , $\nu _\mu$ , $\nu _\tau$ .
png pdf	Table 2: Event selection and object level thresholds for the ttZ selection.
png pdf	Table 3: Definition of the ttZ signal regions.
png pdf	Table 4: The sources of systematic uncertainty grouped in experimental systematic uncertainties (exp.) and theoretical uncertainties (theo.) as well as their impacts on reconstructed objects and event yields.
png pdf	Table 5: Expected 68% and 95% CL intervals, where one Wilson coefficient at a time is considered non-zero.
png pdf	Table 6: Expected 68% and 95% CL intervals for the selected Wilson coefficients in a profiled scan over the 2D parameter planes ${C_{\phi Q}^{-}} / {C_{\phi t}}$ and ${C_\text {tZ}} / {C_\text {tZ}^\text {[Im]}}$ . The respective second parameter of the scan is left free.

Summary

The CMS sensitivity to anomalous interactions using ttZ measurements in the HL-LHC era corresponding to a simulated data set of 3 ab

$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity has been been estimated in the context of SM-EFT. The considered scenario assumed advances in both experimental methods and theoretical descriptions of the relevant physics effects. With the reduced theoretical and experimental uncertainties, tight constraints are expected in two planes spanned by a total of four Wilson coefficients and in one dimensional log-likelihood scans.

Additional Figures
png pdf	Additional Figure 1: Scan of the negative likelihood in the $C_\text {1V}$ / $C_\text {1A}$ parameter plane for the ttZ process under the SM hypothesis. The 68% (95%) CL contour lines are given in green (red). Parameter definition according to [41,45]. The Standard Model values for $C_\text {1V}$ and $C_\text {1A}$ correspond to 0.244 and -0.601 respectively.
png pdf	Additional Figure 2: Scan of the negative likelihood in the $C_\text {2V}$ / $C_\text {2A}$ parameter plane for the ttZ process under the SM hypothesis. The 68% (95%) CL contour lines are given in green (red). Parameter definition according to [41,45].
png pdf	Additional Figure 3: Profiled likelihood ratio for the Wilson coefficient $C_\text {1V}$ for the ttZ process under the SM hypothesis. The 68% (95%) CL intervals are given in green (red). Parameter definition according to [41,45]. The Standard Model value for $C_\text {1V}$ corresponds to 0.244.
png pdf	Additional Figure 4: Profiled likelihood ratio for the Wilson coefficient $C_\text {1A}$ for the ttZ process under the SM hypothesis. The 68% (95%) CL intervals are given in green (red). Parameter definition according to [41,45]. The Standard Model value for $C_\text {1A}$ corresponds to -0.601.
png pdf	Additional Figure 5: Profiled likelihood ratio for the Wilson coefficient $C_\text {2V}$ for the ttZ process under the SM hypothesis. The 68% (95%) CL intervals are given in green (red). Parameter definition according to [41,45].
png pdf	Additional Figure 6: Profiled likelihood ratio for the Wilson coefficient $C_\text {2A}$ for the ttZ process under the SM hypothesis. The 68% (95%) CL intervals are given in green (red). Parameter definition according to [41,45].

Additional Tables
png pdf	Additional Table 1: Expected 68 % and 95 % CL intervals for the selected anomalous coupling parameters in a profiled scan over the 2D parameter planes $C_\text {1V}$ / $C_\text {1A}$ and $C_\text {2V}$ / $C_\text {2A}$ . The respective second parameter of the scan is left free. Parameter definition according to [41,45]. The Standard Model values for $C_\text {1V}$ and $C_\text {1A}$ correspond to 0.244 and -0.601 respectively.
png pdf	Additional Table 2: Expected 68 % and 95 % CL intervals for the selected anomalous coupling parameters in a profiled scan over the 2D parameter planes $\delta X_{t t}^{L}$ / $\delta X_{t t}^{R}$ and $\delta d_{V}^{Z}$ / $\delta d_{A}^{Z}$ . The respective second parameter of the scan is left free. Parameter definition according to [45].
png pdf	Additional Table 3: Expected 68 % and 95 % CL intervals, where one anomalous coupling parameter at a time is considered non-zero. Parameter definition according to [45].

References
1	W. Hollik et al.	Top dipole form-factors and loop induced CP violation in supersymmetry	NPB551 (1999) 3	hep-ph/9812298
2	K. Agashe, G. Perez, and A. Soni	Collider Signals of Top Quark Flavor Violation from a Warped Extra Dimension	PRD75 (2007) 015002
3	A. L. Kagan, G. Perez, T. Volansky, and J. Zupan	General Minimal Flavor Violation	PRD80 (2009) 076002
4	T. Ibrahim and P. Nath	The Top quark electric dipole moment in an MSSM extension with vector like multiplets	PRD82 (2010) 055001
5	T. Ibrahim and P. Nath	The Chromoelectric Dipole Moment of the Top Quark in Models with Vector Like Multiplets	PRD84 (2011) 015003
6	C. Grojean, O. Matsedonskyi, and G. Panico	Light top partners and precision physics	JHEP 10 (2013) 160
7	F. Richard	Can LHC observe an anomaly in ttZ production?		1304.3594
8	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the cross section for top quark pair production in association with a W or Z boson in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV	JHEP 08 (2018) 011	CMS-TOP-17-005 1711.02547
9	M. Schulze and Y. Soreq	Pinning down electroweak dipole operators of the top quark	EPJC76 (2016), no. 8, 466	1603.08911
10	DELPHES 3 Collaboration	DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment	JHEP 02 (2014) 057	1307.6346
11	D. Barducci et al.	Interpreting top-quark LHC measurements in the standard-model effective field theory		1802.07237
12	B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek	Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian	JHEP 10 (2010) 085	1008.4884
13	C. Zhang and S. Willenbrock	Effective-Field-Theory Approach to Top-Quark Production and Decay	PRD83 (2011) 034006	1008.3869
14	CMS Collaboration	The CMS Experiment at the CERN LHC	JINST 3 (2008) S08004	CMS-00-001
15	G. Apollinari et al.	High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC) : Preliminary Design Report
16	CMS Collaboration	Technical Proposal for the Phase-II Upgrade of the CMS Detector	CERN-LHCC-2015-010
17	CMS Collaboration	The Phase-2 Upgrade of the CMS Tracker	CERN-LHCC-2017-009
18	CMS Collaboration	The Phase-2 Upgrade of the CMS Barrel Calorimeters Technical Design Report	CDS
19	CMS Collaboration	The Phase-2 Upgrade of the CMS Endcap Calorimeter	CDS
20	CMS Collaboration	The Phase-2 Upgrade of the CMS Muon Detectors	CDS
21	GEANT4 Collaboration	GEANT4: A Simulation toolkit	NIMA 506 (2003) 250
22	J. Allison et al.	Geant4 developments and applications	IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 270
23	CMS Collaboration	Measurements of $\mathrm{t\overline{t}}$ differential cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV using events containing two leptons		CMS-TOP-17-014 1811.06625
24	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the W boson helicity fractions in the decays of top quark pairs to lepton $+$ jets final states produced in pp collisions at $\sqrt s=$ 8TeV	PLB762 (2016) 512	CMS-TOP-13-008 1605.09047
25	J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. Bernabeu	W polarisation beyond helicity fractions in top quark decays	NPB840 (2010) 349--378	1005.5382
26	J. Brehmer, K. Cranmer, F. Kling, and T. Plehn	Better Higgs boson measurements through information geometry	PRD95 (2017), no. 7, 073002	1612.05261
27	J. Alwall et al.	The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations	JHEP 07 (2014) 079	1405.0301
28	P. Artoisenet and O. Mattelaer	MadWeight: Automatic event reweighting with matrix elements	PoS CHARGED2008 (2008) 025
29	S. Fichet, A. Tonero, and P. Rebello Teles	Sharpening the shape analysis for higher-dimensional operator searches	PRD96 (2017), no. 3, 036003	1611.01165
30	P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer, and R. Rietkerk	Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations	JHEP 03 (2013) 015	1212.3460
31	S. Frixione, E. Laenen, P. Motylinski, and B. R. Webber	Angular correlations of lepton pairs from vector boson and top quark decays in Monte Carlo simulations	JHEP 04 (2007) 081	hep-ph/0702198
32	T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands	A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1	CPC 178 (2008) 852	0710.3820
33	T. Sjostrand et al.	An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2	CPC 191 (2015) 159	1410.3012
34	M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez	FastJet User Manual	Eur.Phys.J. C72 (2012) 1896	1111.6097
35	M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez	The Anti-k(t) jet clustering algorithm	JHEP 0804 (2008) 063	0802.1189
36	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of the $t\overline{t}W$ and $t\overline{t}Z$ production cross sections in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector	JHEP 11 (2015) 172	1509.05276
37	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{Z}$ and $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{W}$ production cross sections in multilepton final states using 3.2 fb $^{-1}$ of pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector	EPJC 77 (2017) 40	1609.01599
38	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of associated production of vector bosons and $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 7 TeV	PRL 110 (2013) 172002	CMS-TOP-12-014 1303.3239
39	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of top quark-antiquark pair production in association with a W or Z boson in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 8 TeV	EPJC 74 (2014) 3060	CMS-TOP-12-036 1406.7830
40	CMS Collaboration	Observation of top quark pairs produced in association with a vector boson in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 8 TeV	JHEP 01 (2016) 096	CMS-TOP-14-021 1510.01131
41	R. Roentsch and M. Schulze	Constraining couplings of top quarks to the Z boson in $t\overline{t}$ + Z production at the LHC	JHEP 07 (2014) 091	1404.1005
42	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of the $t\bar{t}W$ and $t\bar{t}Z$ cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector	ATLAS-CONF-2018-047, CERN, Geneva, Sep
43	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the cross section for top quark pair production in association with a W or Z boson in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV		CMS-TOP-17-005 1711.02547
44	CMS Collaboration	Expected performance of the physics objects with the upgraded CMS detector at the HL-LHC	CDS
45	J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra	A Minimal set of top anomalous couplings	NPB812 (2009) 181	0811.3842