CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-EXO-24-008
Search for low-mass hidden valley dark showers with displaced dimuons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: A search for signatures of a dark analog to quantum chromodynamics is performed. The analysis targets long-lived dark mesons that decay into standard model particles with a high branching fraction to muons. A unique dataset with $ 10^{10} $ B meson events is used. It was collected by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC in 2018 using displaced muon triggers, which have a high trigger efficiency for the signal models. Resonant dimuon signatures are searched for, with both pointing and non-pointing topologies. No significant excess is observed beyond the standard model expectation. Upper limits on the branching ratio of Higgs boson decays to dark partons are determined to be less than $ 10^{-3} $, at 95% confidence level, surpassing and extending existing limits for the mean proper lifetime of less than approximately 0.1 $ \mathrm{m} $ for a mass as low as 2 GeV. First limits are set for extended dark shower models, probing the low-mass region down to 0.33 $ \textrm{GeV} $.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Feynman diagram for the vector portal model. Dark partons $ \psi\bar{\psi} $ are first produced from the decay of the SM Higgs boson, which then hadronise to form dark vector mesons $ \tilde{\omega} $ and dark scalar mesons $ \tilde{\eta} $. The $ \tilde{\omega} $ then undergo displaced decay into SM fermions.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Feynman diagram for the Scenario A model (left) and the Scenario B1 model (right). In these extended models the dark hadronization produces a spectrum of dark mesons, including the dark pions $ \pi_{1}, \pi_{2} $ and $ \pi_{3} $. The $ \pi_{3} $ then decays into SM fermions through the dark photon $ A' $. The $ A' $ is a long-lived particle in Scenario A, while the $ \pi_{3} $ is a long-lived particle in Scenario B1, as indicated by the green lines.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Feynman diagram for the Scenario A model (left) and the Scenario B1 model (right). In these extended models the dark hadronization produces a spectrum of dark mesons, including the dark pions $ \pi_{1}, \pi_{2} $ and $ \pi_{3} $. The $ \pi_{3} $ then decays into SM fermions through the dark photon $ A' $. The $ A' $ is a long-lived particle in Scenario A, while the $ \pi_{3} $ is a long-lived particle in Scenario B1, as indicated by the green lines.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Feynman diagram for the Scenario A model (left) and the Scenario B1 model (right). In these extended models the dark hadronization produces a spectrum of dark mesons, including the dark pions $ \pi_{1}, \pi_{2} $ and $ \pi_{3} $. The $ \pi_{3} $ then decays into SM fermions through the dark photon $ A' $. The $ A' $ is a long-lived particle in Scenario A, while the $ \pi_{3} $ is a long-lived particle in Scenario B1, as indicated by the green lines.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Distributions of the number of muons (left) and the muon transverse impact parameter (right), which are examples of variables that are used in the BDT training for the QCD background and benchmark signal models.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Distributions of the number of muons (left) and the muon transverse impact parameter (right), which are examples of variables that are used in the BDT training for the QCD background and benchmark signal models.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Distributions of the number of muons (left) and the muon transverse impact parameter (right), which are examples of variables that are used in the BDT training for the QCD background and benchmark signal models.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The multiplicity of dark vector mesons $ \tilde{\omega} $ for representative vector portal models (left), and the multiplicity of dark mesons $ \pi_{3} $ for representative Scenario A and B1 models (right). The fraction of generated events is shown against the multiplicity of dark mesons.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The multiplicity of dark vector mesons $ \tilde{\omega} $ for representative vector portal models (left), and the multiplicity of dark mesons $ \pi_{3} $ for representative Scenario A and B1 models (right). The fraction of generated events is shown against the multiplicity of dark mesons.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The multiplicity of dark vector mesons $ \tilde{\omega} $ for representative vector portal models (left), and the multiplicity of dark mesons $ \pi_{3} $ for representative Scenario A and B1 models (right). The fraction of generated events is shown against the multiplicity of dark mesons.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Dimuon mass distributions in the single vertex categories for data and two benchmark signal models in the vector portal. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Dimuon mass distributions in the single vertex categories for data and two benchmark signal models in the vector portal. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Dimuon mass distributions in the single vertex categories for data and two benchmark signal models in the vector portal. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
Dimuon mass distributions in the single vertex categories for data and two benchmark signal models in the vector portal. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
Dimuon mass distributions in the single vertex categories for data and two benchmark signal models in the vector portal. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 5-e:
Dimuon mass distributions in the single vertex categories for data and two benchmark signal models in the vector portal. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 5-f:
Dimuon mass distributions in the single vertex categories for data and two benchmark signal models in the vector portal. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Dimuon mass distributions in the multi vertex categories for data and two benchmark signal models in the vector portal. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Dimuon mass distributions in the multi vertex categories for data and two benchmark signal models in the vector portal. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Dimuon mass distributions in the multi vertex categories for data and two benchmark signal models in the vector portal. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
Dimuon mass distributions in the multi vertex categories for data and two benchmark signal models in the vector portal. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 6-d:
Dimuon mass distributions in the multi vertex categories for data and two benchmark signal models in the vector portal. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 6-e:
Dimuon mass distributions in the multi vertex categories for data and two benchmark signal models in the vector portal. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 6-f:
Dimuon mass distributions in the multi vertex categories for data and two benchmark signal models in the vector portal. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Dimuon mass distributions in a mass window around 0.67 GeV (left) and a mass window arond 1.33 GeV (right), both in the single vertex category with 1 $ \,\text{cm} < l_{xy} < 10\,\text{cm} $ and $ \textrm{pointing angle} < $ 0.2. The background fit is shown together with the signal expected for a representative Scenario A model (left) and a representative Scenario B1 model (right).

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
Dimuon mass distributions in a mass window around 0.67 GeV (left) and a mass window arond 1.33 GeV (right), both in the single vertex category with 1 $ \,\text{cm} < l_{xy} < 10\,\text{cm} $ and $ \textrm{pointing angle} < $ 0.2. The background fit is shown together with the signal expected for a representative Scenario A model (left) and a representative Scenario B1 model (right).

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
Dimuon mass distributions in a mass window around 0.67 GeV (left) and a mass window arond 1.33 GeV (right), both in the single vertex category with 1 $ \,\text{cm} < l_{xy} < 10\,\text{cm} $ and $ \textrm{pointing angle} < $ 0.2. The background fit is shown together with the signal expected for a representative Scenario A model (left) and a representative Scenario B1 model (right).

png pdf
Figure 8:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the vector portal model. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\omega}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=m_{\tilde{\eta}} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\omega}} $, $ \tilde{\Lambda} $ and $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ are the mass of the dark sector spin-one meson, the dark sector confinement scale, and the mass of the dark sector spin-zero meson respectively.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the vector portal model. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\omega}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=m_{\tilde{\eta}} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\omega}} $, $ \tilde{\Lambda} $ and $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ are the mass of the dark sector spin-one meson, the dark sector confinement scale, and the mass of the dark sector spin-zero meson respectively.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the vector portal model. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\omega}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=m_{\tilde{\eta}} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\omega}} $, $ \tilde{\Lambda} $ and $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ are the mass of the dark sector spin-one meson, the dark sector confinement scale, and the mass of the dark sector spin-zero meson respectively.

png pdf
Figure 8-c:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the vector portal model. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\omega}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=m_{\tilde{\eta}} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\omega}} $, $ \tilde{\Lambda} $ and $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ are the mass of the dark sector spin-one meson, the dark sector confinement scale, and the mass of the dark sector spin-zero meson respectively.

png pdf
Figure 8-d:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the vector portal model. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\omega}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=m_{\tilde{\eta}} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\omega}} $, $ \tilde{\Lambda} $ and $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ are the mass of the dark sector spin-one meson, the dark sector confinement scale, and the mass of the dark sector spin-zero meson respectively.

png pdf
Figure 9:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the Scenario A model. It is assumed that $ m_{\eta}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\pi_{2}} $ and $ \textrm{sin}\:\theta= $ 0.1, where $ m_{\eta} $ is the mass of the dark sector pseudoscalar and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrizing the isospin violation. The branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(\pi_{3}\rightarrow A'A') $ is assumed to be one.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the Scenario A model. It is assumed that $ m_{\eta}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\pi_{2}} $ and $ \textrm{sin}\:\theta= $ 0.1, where $ m_{\eta} $ is the mass of the dark sector pseudoscalar and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrizing the isospin violation. The branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(\pi_{3}\rightarrow A'A') $ is assumed to be one.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the Scenario A model. It is assumed that $ m_{\eta}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\pi_{2}} $ and $ \textrm{sin}\:\theta= $ 0.1, where $ m_{\eta} $ is the mass of the dark sector pseudoscalar and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrizing the isospin violation. The branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(\pi_{3}\rightarrow A'A') $ is assumed to be one.

png pdf
Figure 9-c:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the Scenario A model. It is assumed that $ m_{\eta}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\pi_{2}} $ and $ \textrm{sin}\:\theta= $ 0.1, where $ m_{\eta} $ is the mass of the dark sector pseudoscalar and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrizing the isospin violation. The branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(\pi_{3}\rightarrow A'A') $ is assumed to be one.

png pdf
Figure 9-d:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the Scenario A model. It is assumed that $ m_{\eta}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\pi_{2}} $ and $ \textrm{sin}\:\theta= $ 0.1, where $ m_{\eta} $ is the mass of the dark sector pseudoscalar and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrizing the isospin violation. The branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(\pi_{3}\rightarrow A'A') $ is assumed to be one.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the Scenario B1 model. It is assumed that $ m_{\eta}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\pi_{2}} $ and $ \textrm{sin}\:\theta= $ 0.1, where $ m_{\eta} $ is the mass of the dark sector pseudoscalar and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrizing the isospin violation. The branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(\pi_{3}\rightarrow A'A') $ is assumed to be one.

png pdf
Figure 10-a:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the Scenario B1 model. It is assumed that $ m_{\eta}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\pi_{2}} $ and $ \textrm{sin}\:\theta= $ 0.1, where $ m_{\eta} $ is the mass of the dark sector pseudoscalar and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrizing the isospin violation. The branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(\pi_{3}\rightarrow A'A') $ is assumed to be one.

png pdf
Figure 10-b:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the Scenario B1 model. It is assumed that $ m_{\eta}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\pi_{2}} $ and $ \textrm{sin}\:\theta= $ 0.1, where $ m_{\eta} $ is the mass of the dark sector pseudoscalar and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrizing the isospin violation. The branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(\pi_{3}\rightarrow A'A') $ is assumed to be one.

png pdf
Figure 10-c:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the Scenario B1 model. It is assumed that $ m_{\eta}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\pi_{2}} $ and $ \textrm{sin}\:\theta= $ 0.1, where $ m_{\eta} $ is the mass of the dark sector pseudoscalar and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrizing the isospin violation. The branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(\pi_{3}\rightarrow A'A') $ is assumed to be one.

png pdf
Figure 10-d:
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow\psi\psi) $ for representative mass hypotheses for the Scenario B1 model. It is assumed that $ m_{\eta}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\pi_{2}} $ and $ \textrm{sin}\:\theta= $ 0.1, where $ m_{\eta} $ is the mass of the dark sector pseudoscalar and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrizing the isospin violation. The branching ratio $ \mathcal{B}(\pi_{3}\rightarrow A'A') $ is assumed to be one.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Model parameters of the different classes of signal models interpreted by the analysis.
Summary
A search for dark showers has been performed with displaced dimuons, using proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected by the CMS experiment in 2018. The dataset uses a novel trigger and data processing strategy, resulting in a sample of about $ 10^{10} $ recorded events and accessibility to low-mass phase space down to the sub-GeV scale. No significant excess beyond the standard model expectation is observed. Upper limits on the branching ratio of Higgs boson decays into dark partons are set at $ < 10^{-3} $ at 95% confidence level, which give the most stringent limits to date on the vector portal model for mean proper lifetime below approximately 0.1 m and mass as low as 2 GeV. First limits have also been set for extended dark shower models (Scenario A and Scenario B1) with mass down to 0.33 GeV.
References
1 V. C. Rubin, N. Thonnard, and W. K. Ford, Jr. Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 (R = 4kpc) to UGC 2885 (R = 122 kpc) Astrophys. J. 238 (1980) 471
2 M. Markevitch et al. Direct constraints on the dark matter self-interaction cross-section from the merging galaxy cluster 1E0657-56 Astrophys. J. 606 (2004) 819 astro-ph/0309303
3 Planck Collaboration Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters [Erratum: doi:10./0004-6361/33910e], 2020
Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6
1807.06209
4 A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi Dark matter and the early Universe: a review Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 119 (2021) 103865 2104.11488
5 M. Persic, P. Salucci, and F. Stel The Universal rotation curve of spiral galaxies: 1. The Dark matter connection Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 281 (1996) 27 astro-ph/9506004
6 M. J. Strassler and K. M. Zurek Echoes of a hidden valley at hadron colliders PLB 651 (2007) 374 hep-ph/0604261
7 T. Hur, D.-W. Jung, P. Ko, and J. Y. Lee Electroweak symmetry breaking and cold dark matter from strongly interacting hidden sector no.~3, 262, 2011
Physics Letters B 696 (2011)
8 G. D. Kribs, T. S. Roy, J. Terning, and K. M. Zurek Quirky composite dark matter PRD 81 (2010) 095001
9 H. Beauchesne, E. Bertuzzo, and G. Grilli Di Cortona Dark matter in Hidden Valley models with stable and unstable light dark mesons JHEP 04 (2019) 118 1809.10152
10 A. Francis, R. J. Hudspith, R. Lewis, and S. Tulin Dark Matter from Strong Dynamics: The Minimal Theory of Dark Baryons JHEP 12 (2018) 118 1809.09117
11 E. Bernreuther, F. Kahlhoefer, M. Kr ä mer, and P. Tunney Strongly interacting dark sectors in the early Universe and at the LHC through a simplified portal JHEP 01 (2020) 162 1907.04346
12 S. Knapen, J. Shelton, and D. Xu Perturbative benchmark models for a dark shower search program PRD 103 (2021) 115013 2103.01238
13 S. Born, R. Karur, S. Knapen, and J. Shelton Scouting for dark showers at CMS and LHCb PRD 108 (2023) 035034 2303.04167
14 CMS Collaboration Enriching the physics program of the CMS Experiment via data scouting and data parking 3, . . Accepted by Phys. Rept, 2024 CMS-EXO-23-007
2403.16134
15 CMS Collaboration Recording and reconstructing 10 billion unbiased b hadron decays in CMS EPJ Web Conf. 245 (2020) 01025
16 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
17 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived particles decaying into muon pairs in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV collected with a dedicated high-rate data stream JHEP 04 (2022) 062 CMS-EXO-20-014
2112.13769
18 ATLAS Collaboration Search for long-lived particles in final states with displaced dimuon vertices in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 99 (2019) 012001 1808.03057
19 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
20 CMS Collaboration Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3 no.~05, P05064, 2024
JINST 19 (2024)
CMS-PRF-21-001
2309.05466
21 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13\,TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
22 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
23 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
24 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
25 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
26 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
27 CMS Collaboration Performance of reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ leptons decaying to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P10005 CMS-TAU-16-003
1809.02816
28 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
29 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13\,TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
30 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
31 C. Bierlich et al. A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3 SciPost Phys. Codeb. 2022 (2022) 8 2203.11601
32 L. Carloni, J. Rathsman, and T. Sjostrand Discerning secluded sector gauge structures JHEP 04 (2011) 091 1102.3795
33 E. Witten Current algebra theorems for the U(1) Goldstone boson NPB 156 (1979) 269
34 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived particles decaying to final states with a pair of muons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13.6 TeV JHEP 05 (2024) 047 CMS-EXO-23-014
2402.14491
35 T. Chen and C. Guestrin XGBoost in nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, aug, 2016
Proceedings of the 2 (2016) 2
36 R. Fruhwirth Application of Kalman filtering to track and vertex fitting NIM A 262 (1987) 444
37 P. D. Dauncey, M. Kenzie, N. Wardle, and G. J. Davies Handling uncertainties in background shapes: the discrete profiling method (apr, ) P04015, 2015
Journal of Instrumentation 1 (2015) 0
1408.6865
38 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2019
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
39 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector Collaboration, D.~de~Florian et~al., . CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs. CERN, Geneva, 2017
link
40 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics [Erratum: 10.1140/epjc/s2-013-2501-z], 2011
EPJC 71 (2011) 1554
1007.1727
41 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIM A 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
42 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: The $ CL_s $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
43 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived particles decaying in the CMS muon detectors in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV PRD 110 (2024) 032007 CMS-EXO-21-008
2402.01898
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN