CMS-PAS-EXO-16-007

CMS-PAS-EXO-16-007
Search for pair-production of second-generation scalar leptoquarks in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the CMS detector
CMS Collaboration
March 2016

Abstract: A search is presented for pair-produced second-generation scalar leptoquarks, using 2.7 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected by the CMS detector during the 2015 proton-proton running of the LHC. A final state signature containing two high $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ muons and at least two jets is considered. Second generation scalar leptoquarks with masses less than 1165 (960) GeV are excluded when assuming the leptoquark branching fraction to a charged lepton and a quark $\beta=$ 1 ($\beta=$ 0.5).
Links: CDS record (PDF) ; inSPIRE record ; CADI line (restricted) ;

Figures & Tables	Additional Figures	References	CMS Publications

Figures
png pdf	Figure 1: Distributions of the muon and the jet $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $'s at preselection level. The contribution denoted as "Other Background" includes diboson, W+jets, and single-top contributions. Signal distributions are overlaid for LQ masses of 650 and 950 GeV.
png pdf	Figure 1-a: Distributions of the first muon $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $'s at preselection level. The contribution denoted as "Other Background" includes diboson, W+jets, and single-top contributions. Signal distributions are overlaid for LQ masses of 650 and 950 GeV.
png pdf	Figure 1-b: Distributions of the second muon $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $'s at preselection level. The contribution denoted as "Other Background" includes diboson, W+jets, and single-top contributions. Signal distributions are overlaid for LQ masses of 650 and 950 GeV.
png pdf	Figure 1-c: Distributions of the first jet $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $'s at preselection level. The contribution denoted as "Other Background" includes diboson, W+jets, and single-top contributions. Signal distributions are overlaid for LQ masses of 650 and 950 GeV.
png pdf	Figure 1-d: Distributions of the second jet $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $'s at preselection level. The contribution denoted as "Other Background" includes diboson, W+jets, and single-top contributions. Signal distributions are overlaid for LQ masses of 650 and 950 GeV.
png pdf	Figure 2: Distributions of $S_{\mathrm{T}}$, $M_{\mu \mu }$, and of $ M_{min}(\mu , {\mathrm {jet}})$ at preselection level. The contribution denoted as "Other Background" includes diboson, W+jets, and single-top contributions. Signal distributions are overlaid for LQ masses of 650 and 950 GeV.
png pdf	Figure 2-a: Distribution of $S_{\mathrm{T}}$ at preselection level. The contribution denoted as "Other Background" includes diboson, W+jets, and single-top contributions. Signal distributions are overlaid for LQ masses of 650 and 950 GeV.
png pdf	Figure 2-b: Distribution of $M_{\mu \mu }$ at preselection level. The contribution denoted as "Other Background" includes diboson, W+jets, and single-top contributions. Signal distributions are overlaid for LQ masses of 650 and 950 GeV.
png pdf	Figure 2-c: Distribution of $ M_{min}(\mu , {\mathrm {jet}})$ at preselection level. The contribution denoted as "Other Background" includes diboson, W+jets, and single-top contributions. Signal distributions are overlaid for LQ masses of 650 and 950 GeV.
png pdf	Figure 3: Expected and observed upper limits at 95% CL on the scalar leptoquark pair production cross section times $\beta ^2$ as a function of the second-generation scalar leptoquark mass. The expected limits and uncertainty bands represent the median expected limits and the 68% and 95% confidence intervals. The $\sigma _{\rm theory}$ curves and their bands represent, respectively, the theoretical scalar leptoquark pair production cross section and the uncertainties due to the choice of PDF and renormalization/factorization scales.

Tables
png pdf	Table 1: NLO cross-sections for the scalar LQ Monte Carlo sets used in the analysis.
png pdf	Table 2: Optimized thresholds for different signal mass hypotheses. All values are in GeV.
png pdf	Table 3: Event yields at final selection level, with signal yields given for $\beta =$ 1. Uncertainties are Poisson uncertainties on the MC background, except for the second uncertainty for "All BG", which gives the total systematic uncertainty as detailed in Section {systematics}. Systematic uncertainties are dominated by energy scale and shape uncertainties.

Additional Figures

png pdf

Additional Figure 1:
Expected and observed upper limits at 95% CL on the long-lived RPV SUSY $\tilde{t}$ pair production cross section as a function of $\tilde{t}$ mass (x-axis) and lifetime (y-axis). The expected limits and uncertainty bands represent the median expected limits and the 68% and 95% confidence intervals. Extrapolation has been performed to produce a limit plot down to the prompt kinematic range. On the right hand side, the expected and observed limits have been extrapolated to the prompt LQ limits at $c\tau $=0 cm, taking into account the different branching fractions to muons between the two models. This is motivated by the fact that once the $\tilde{t}$ become prompt, they are nearly kinematically identical to LQs. The observed limit curve of the dedicated CMS search for displaced leptons in the e-mu channel (CMS EXO-16-022) has been overlaid.

References
1	W. Buchmuller et al.	Leptoquarks in Lepton-Quark Collisions	PLB191 (1987) 442
2	S. Dimopoulos and L. Susskind	Mass Without Scalars	Nucl. Phys. B 155 (1979) 237
3	S. Dimopoulos	Technicolored Signatures	Nucl. Phys. B 168 (1980) 69
4	E. Eichten and K. Lane	Dynamical Breaking of the Weak Interaction Symmetries	PLB 90 (1980) 85
5	V. D. Angelopoulos et al.	Search for New Quarks Suggested by the Superstring	Nucl. Phys. B 292 (1987) 59
6	W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler	Constraints on SU(5)-type Leptoquarks	PLB 177 (1986) 377
7	O. Shanker	$ \pi \ell 2$, $K \ell 3$, and $K ^0 $-$ \bar{K}^0 $ Constraints on Leptoquarks and Supersymmetric Particles	Nucl. Phys. B 204 (1982) 375
8	H. Dreiner	An Introduction to Explicit R-parity Violation	Pramana 51 (1998) 123--133
9	D0 Collaboration	Search for Pair Production of Second Generation Scalar Leptoquarks in $ p\bar{p} $ Collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 1.96 TeV	PLB 671 (2009) 224	0808.4023
10	ATLAS Collaboration	Search for First Generation Scalar Leptoquarks in $ pp $ Collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 7 TeV with the ATLAS Detector	PLB 709 (2012) 158	1112.4828
11	ATLAS Collaboration	Search for Second Generation Scalar Leptoquarks in pp Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS Detector	Eur. Phys. J C 72 (2012) 1--21	1203.3172
12	CMS Collaboration	Search for pair production of first- and second-generation scalar leptoquarks in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV	PRD 86 (Sep, 2012) 052013
13	CMS Collaboration	Search for pair production of first and second generation leptoquarks in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV	PRD 93 (Feb, 2016) 032004
14	ATLAS Collaboration	Searches for scalar leptoquarks in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector	EPJC 76 (2016), no. 1, 5	1508.04735
15	CMS Collaboration	The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC	JINST 3 (2008) S08004	CMS-00-001
16	CMS Collaboration	Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in $ pp $ collision events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV	JINST 7 (2012) P10002	CMS-MUO-10-004 1206.4071
17	T. \protect Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands	PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual	JHEP 05 (2006) 026	hep-ph/0603175
18	T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands	A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1	Comput.Phys.Commun. 178 (2008) 852--867	0710.3820
19	J. Pumplin et al.	New Generation of Parton Distributions with Uncertainties from Global QCD Analysis	JHEP 07 (2002) 012	hep-ph/0201195
20	M. Kramer et al.	Pair production of scalar leptoquarks at the CERN LHC	PRD 71 (2005)
21	M. Kramer, T. Plehn, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas	Pair production of scalar leptoquarks at the Tevatron	PRL 79 (1997) 341--344	hep-ph/9704322
22	GEANT4 Collaboration	GEANT4---a simulation toolkit	NIMA 506 (2003) 250
23	F. Maltoni and T. Stelzer	Madevent: Automatic Event Generation with MadGraph	JHEP 02 (2003) 027	hep-ph/0208156
24	J. Alwall et al.	MadGraph/MadEvent v4: The New Web Generation	JHEP 09 (2007) 028	0706.2334
25	S. Alioli et al.	A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX	JHEP 06 (2010) 043	1002.2581
26	CMS Collaboration	Muon Reconstruction and Identification Improvements for Run-2 and First Results with 2015 Run Data	CDS
27	CMS Collaboration	Commissioning of the Particle-Flow Reconstruction in Minimum-Bias and Jet Events from $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ Collisions at 7 TeV	CDS
28	CMS Collaboration	Jet Performance in pp Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} =$ 7 TeV	CDS
29	M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez	The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm	JHEP 04 (2008) 063	0802.1189
30	CMS Collaboration	Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS	JINST 6 (2011) 11002	CMS-JME-10-011 1107.4277
31	CMS Collaboration	Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV	Journal of Instrumentation 10 (2015), no. 06, P06005
32	G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells	Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics	EPJC 71 (2011) 1554, , [Erratum: Eur. Phys. J.C73,2501(2013)]	1007.1727
33	CMS Collaboration	CMS Luminosity Measurement for the 2015 Data Taking Period
34	CMS Collaboration	Search for a Narrow Resonance Produced in 13 TeV pp Collisions Decaying to Electron Pair or Muon Pair Final States	CMS-PAS-EXO-15-005	CMS-PAS-EXO-15-005
35	CMS Collaboration	Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS	JINST 6 (2011) P11002
36	J. Butterworth et al.	PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II	JPG43 (2016) 023001	1510.03865
37	T. Junk	Confidence Level Computation for Combining Searches with Small Statistics	NIMA 434 (1999) 435	hep-ex/9902006
38	A. L. Read	Modified frequentist analysis of search results (the $ CL_{s} $ method)	CERN-OPEN 2000-205, 2000 1st Workshop on Confidence Limits, CERN, Jan. 2000