Processing math: 100%
CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-BPH-24-003
Observation of a family of all-charm tetraquark candidates at the LHC
Abstract: Three structures, X(6600), X(6900), and X(7100), have been reported in the J/ψJ/ψ channel. These are prime candidates for all-charm tetraquarks. We extend our earlier study of these structures in proton-proton collisions using the CMS detector at the LHC, with 3.6 times more J/ψJ/ψ pairs (315 fb1 of total integrated luminosity). The statistical uncertainties on the masses and widths are reduced by about a factor of three, and the systematic uncertainties are also substantially reduced. For the first time all three structures are established with a significance well above five standard deviations (5σ). Good descriptions of the J/ψJ/ψ spectrum were based on quantum interference among structures, which is now validated with significances of more than 5σ relative to the fit with no interference---implying all structures have the same JPC quantum numbers, and suggests a family of states.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Idealized models of potential quark configurations for all-charm mesons. Far left: a conventional charmonium state, which is not a viable option for the very massive J/ψJ/ψ states. Center: various possibilities for tetraquarks---weakly bound molecule, cc¯c¯c diquark, and a compact tetraquark with amorphous substructure, and hybrid state of cc¯c¯c plus valence gluon (g). Far right: one example of the class of non-resonant threshold effects, a triangle singularity, where, in this case, the scattering of J/ψ and ψ(3770) mesons in production is enhanced through a triangular loop exchanging D mesons (the ψ(3770) is an excited state of the J/ψ), and this could potentially lead to a peak-like structure in the J/ψJ/ψ mass around 6900 MeV [15].

png pdf
Figure 2:
The two dimensional distribution of the double-dimuon masses for the final selection of J/ψJ/ψ events in the 6--15 GeV four-muon mass range for the Run 2+3 data. The two μ+μ pairs are ordered by their total transverse momentum (pT).

png pdf
Figure 3:
The selected J/ψJ/ψ invariant-mass spectrum up to 9 GeV. The data is fit (up to 15 GeV, see text) with the 3-way interference model, consisting of three signal functions (BW1, BW2, and BW3), a background threshold BW0, and background components (NRSPS, DPS, combinatoric, and X(6900)J/ψψ(2S) feeddown). The cumulative squared amplitude of the interfering signals is also shown. The lower panel shows the deviations of the data points from the fitted curve in standard deviations.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The J/ψJ/ψ invariant mass spectrum for the no-interference in the 6--9 GeV four-muon mass range (upper) and the interference fit for the full fit range (lower) (see text in the main paper for model details). The curve labeled "Interfering BWs" represents the total contribution from all interference amplitudes and their cross terms. The lower panels of the plots display the number of standard deviations (considering only statistical uncertainties) by which the binned data deviate from the fit.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The J/ψJ/ψ invariant mass spectrum for the no-interference in the 6--9 GeV four-muon mass range (upper) and the interference fit for the full fit range (lower) (see text in the main paper for model details). The curve labeled "Interfering BWs" represents the total contribution from all interference amplitudes and their cross terms. The lower panels of the plots display the number of standard deviations (considering only statistical uncertainties) by which the binned data deviate from the fit.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The J/ψJ/ψ invariant mass spectrum for the no-interference in the 6--9 GeV four-muon mass range (upper) and the interference fit for the full fit range (lower) (see text in the main paper for model details). The curve labeled "Interfering BWs" represents the total contribution from all interference amplitudes and their cross terms. The lower panels of the plots display the number of standard deviations (considering only statistical uncertainties) by which the binned data deviate from the fit.

png pdf
Figure 5:
The X widths as a function of radial index for both interference and no-interference fits. An exponential function is fit to the points. Uncertainties are only statistical.

png pdf
Figure 6:
The J/ψJ/ψ invariant mass spectrum for the individual Run 2 and Run 3 datasets (upper), and for Run 2 compared with the combined Run 2+3 dataset (lower).

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
The J/ψJ/ψ invariant mass spectrum for the individual Run 2 and Run 3 datasets (upper), and for Run 2 compared with the combined Run 2+3 dataset (lower).

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
The J/ψJ/ψ invariant mass spectrum for the individual Run 2 and Run 3 datasets (upper), and for Run 2 compared with the combined Run 2+3 dataset (lower).

png pdf
Figure 7:
The J/ψJ/ψ invariant mass spectrum for the interference fit for the 6--9 GeV range (upper) and the full fit range (lower) with the Run 3 data. The curve labeled "Interfering BWs" represents the total contribution from all interference amplitudes and their cross terms. The lower panels of the plots display the number of standard deviations (considering only statistical uncertainties) by which the binned data deviate from the fit.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
The J/ψJ/ψ invariant mass spectrum for the interference fit for the 6--9 GeV range (upper) and the full fit range (lower) with the Run 3 data. The curve labeled "Interfering BWs" represents the total contribution from all interference amplitudes and their cross terms. The lower panels of the plots display the number of standard deviations (considering only statistical uncertainties) by which the binned data deviate from the fit.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
The J/ψJ/ψ invariant mass spectrum for the interference fit for the 6--9 GeV range (upper) and the full fit range (lower) with the Run 3 data. The curve labeled "Interfering BWs" represents the total contribution from all interference amplitudes and their cross terms. The lower panels of the plots display the number of standard deviations (considering only statistical uncertainties) by which the binned data deviate from the fit.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Fit results of the J/ψJ/ψ mass spectra for various data sets with interference in MeV (uncertainties are statistical followed by systematic). The ``Run 2'' result is a copy of Ref. [12] for comparison.

png pdf
Table 2:
The dominant contributions to the systematic uncertainties, in MeV, for the triplet for our main fit.

png pdf
Table 3:
Fit results of the J/ψJ/ψ mass spectra for various data sets in MeV (dual uncertainties are statistical followed by systematic, single uncertainties are statistical only). Our baseline fit is Run 2+Run 3 data with interference (reproduced from main text).
Summary
We have extended our study of the J/ψJ/ψ mass spectrum with 3.6 times more J/ψJ/ψ pairs. The spectrum is well described by mutually interfering X(6600), X(6900), and X(7100) structures. The statistical uncertainties on their masses and widths are reduced by a factor of three over our previous results [12]. For the first time, all three structures are established with a significance well above five standard deviations (5σ). Similarly, interference among the three structures is now statistically compelling. Interference implies that the structures have common JPC quantum numbers---suggesting a family of states. Recently CMS reported an angular analysis of the XJ/ψJ/ψ decay characteristics and found the JPC quantum numbers of the X family is most likely 2++ [35].
References
1 M. Gell-Mann A schematic model of baryons and mesons PL 8 (1964) 214
2 G. Zweig An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking CERN-TH-401, 1964
3 E598 Collaboration Experimental observation of a heavy particle J PRL 33 (1974) 1404
4 SLAC-SP-017 Collaboration Discovery of a narrow resonance in e+e annihilation PRL 33 (1974) 1406
5 L. G. Landsberg The search for exotic hadrons Phys. Usp. 42 (1999) 871
6 Belle Collaboration Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B±K±π+πJ/ψ decays PRL 91 (2003) 262001 hep-ex/0309032
7 F. E. Close and P. R. Page The D0 anti-D0 threshold resonance --123, 2004
PLB 578 (2004) 119
hep-ph/0309253
8 H.-X. Chen et al. An updated review of the new hadron states no.~2, 026201, 2023
Rept. Prog. Phys. 86 (2023)
2204.02649
9 A. Ali, L. Maiani, and A. D. Polosa Multiquark Hadrons Cambridge University Press, 2019
link
10 BESIII Collaboration Observation of a charged charmoniumlike structure in e+eπ+πJ/ψ at s =4.26 GeV PRL 110 (2013) 252001 1303.5949
11 Belle Collaboration Study of e+eπ+πJ/ψ and observation of a charged charmoniumlike state at Belle PRL 110 (2013) 252002
12 CMS Collaboration Observation of new structure in the J/ψJ/ψ mass spectrum in proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV Phys. Rev. Lett, 2024 CMS-BPH-21-003
2306.07164
13 LHCb Collaboration Observation of structure in the J/ψ-pair mass spectrum Sci. Bull. 65 (2020) 1983 2006.16957
14 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of an excess of dicharmonium events in the four-muon final state with the ATLAS detector PRL 131 (2023) 2304.08962
15 Y. Lu, C. Chen, G.-y. Qin, and H.-Q. Zheng A discussion on the anomalous threshold enhancement of J/ψ--ψ(3770) couplings and X(6900) peak Chin. Phys. C 48 (2024) 2312.10711
16 B.-D. Wan and C.-F. Qiao Gluonic tetracharm configuration of X(6900) PLB 817 (2021) 136339 2012.00454
17 M. Y. Barabanov et al. Diquark correlations in hadron physics: Origin, impact and evidence Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 116 (2021) 103835 2008.07630
18 CMS Collaboration The CMS Experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
19 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
20 Particle Data Group Collaboration Review of Particle Physics PTEP 2020 (2020)
21 A. R. Bohm and Y. Sato Relativistic resonances: Their masses, widths, lifetimes, superposition, and causal evolution PRD 71 (2005) 085018 hep-ph/0412106
22 CMD-3 Collaboration Study of the process e+eK0SK0Sπ+π in the c.m. energy range 1.6-2.0 GeV with the CMD-3 detector PLB 804 (2020) 135380 1912.05751
23 M. Pivk and F. Le Diberder sPlot: A statistical tool to unfold data distributions NIMA 555 (2005) physics/0402083
24 CMS Collaboration Observation of X(6900) and evidence of X(7100) in the J/ψψ(2S)μ+μμ+μ mass spectrum in pp collisions at CMS CMS PAS-BPH-22-004, 2025 CMS-PAS-BPH-22-004
25 J.-Z. Wang, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki Fully-heavy structures in the invariant mass spectrum of J/ψψ(3686), J/ψψ(3770), ψ(3686)ψ(3686), and J/ψΥ(1S) at hadron colliders PLB 816 (2021) 136209 2012.03281
26 T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 Computer Physics Communications 178 (2008)
27 H. Jung et al. The CCFM monte carlo generator CASCADE Version 2.2.03 EPJC 70 (2010)
28 H.-S. Shao HELAC-Onia: An automatic matrix element generator for heavy quarkonium physics Computer Physics Communications 184 (2013)
29 J.-P. Lansberg and H.-S. Shao J/ψ-pair production at large momenta: Indications for double parton scatterings and large α5s contributions PLB 751 (2015) 479
30 J.-P. Lansberg and H.-S. Shao Production of J/ψ+ηc versus J/ψ+J/ψ at the LHC: Importance of real α5s corrections PRL 111 (2013)
31 H.-S. Shao HELAC-Onia 2.0: an upgraded matrix-element and event generator for heavy quarkonium physics Comput. Phys. Commun. 198 (2016) 238 1507.03435
32 X.-K. Dong et al. Coupled-Channel Interpretation of the LHCb Double- J/ψ Spectrum and Hints of a New State Near the J/ψJ/ψ Threshold PRL 126 (2021) 2009.07795
33 F.-K. Guo, X.-H. Liu, and S. Sakai Threshold cusps and triangle singularities in hadronic reactions Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 112 (2020) 103757 1912.07030
34 C. Gong et al. Nature of X(6900) and its production mechanism at LHCb PLB 824 (2022) 136794 2011.11374
35 CMS Collaboration Spin and symmetry properties of all-charm tetraquarks CMS PAS-BPH-24-002, 2025
36 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at s= 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
37 Y. Gao et al. Spin determination of single-produced resonances at hadron colliders link 1001.3396
38 S. Bolognesi et al. On the spin and parity of a single-produced resonance at the LHC link 1208.4018
39 I. Anderson et al. Constraining anomalous HVV interactions at proton and lepton colliders link 1309.4819
40 A. V. Gritsan, R. Rontsch, M. Schulze, and M. Xiao Constraining anomalous Higgs boson couplings to the heavy flavor fermions using matrix element techniques link 1606.03107
41 A. V. Gritsan et al. New features in the JHU generator framework: Constraining Higgs boson properties from on-shell and off-shell production Physical Review D 102 (2020) 2002.09888
42 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4--a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN