CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-BPH-15-001
Measurement of angular observables in the decay $\mathrm{B}^{+} \to \mathrm{K}^{+} \mu^+\mu^-$ from proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV
Abstract: The angular distribution of the flavor-changing neutral current decay $\mathrm{B}^{+} \to \mathrm{K}^{+} \mu^+\mu^- $ is studied in pp collisions at the center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV. The analysis is based on data collected by the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 20.5 fb$^{-1}$. The forward-backward asymmetry $A_{FB}$ of the dimuon system and the contribution $F_{H}$ from the pseudo-scalar, scalar, and tensor amplitudes to the decay width are measured with respect to the squared dimuon mass. The measurements are consistent with the standard model expectations.
Figures & Tables Summary Additional Figures References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The SM electroweak $\mathrm {Z}/\gamma $ penguin (left) and $\mathrm {W^+W^-}$ box (right) diagrams for the decay process $\mathrm {B}^{+} \to \mathrm {K}^{+} \mu ^+\mu ^- $.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Projections of the fit results from the data in the $\mathrm {B}$ meson invariant mass (left) and $\cos\theta _{\ell}$ (right) distributions in the low-$q^2$ range 1.00-6.00 GeV$^2$. The solid lines show the total fit results, the shaded area the signal contribution, and the dash-dotted lines the background. The vertical bars on the points represent the statistical uncertainty in the data. The lower plots show the distributions of pulls, the difference between the data and the fit result, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Projections of the fit results from the data in the $\mathrm {B}$ meson invariant mass (left) and $\cos\theta _{\ell}$ (right) distributions in the low-$q^2$ range 1.00-6.00 GeV$^2$. The solid lines show the total fit results, the shaded area the signal contribution, and the dash-dotted lines the background. The vertical bars on the points represent the statistical uncertainty in the data. The lower plots show the distributions of pulls, the difference between the data and the fit result, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Projections of the fit results from the data in the $\mathrm {B}$ meson invariant mass (left) and $\cos\theta _{\ell}$ (right) distributions in the low-$q^2$ range 1.00-6.00 GeV$^2$. The solid lines show the total fit results, the shaded area the signal contribution, and the dash-dotted lines the background. The vertical bars on the points represent the statistical uncertainty in the data. The lower plots show the distributions of pulls, the difference between the data and the fit result, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Results of the measurement of $A_{FB}$ (left) and $F_{H}$ (right) in bins of $q^2$. The statistical uncertainties are shown by the inner vertical bars, while the outer vertical bars give the total uncertainties. The horizontal bars show the bin widths. The vertical shaded regions correspond to the $\mathrm {J}/\psi $ and $\psi '$ resonances. The horizontal shaded band shows the DHMV SM theoretical prediction [30,31]. The predictions from two other calculations are given in Table xxxxx.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Results of the measurement of $A_{FB}$ (left) and $F_{H}$ (right) in bins of $q^2$. The statistical uncertainties are shown by the inner vertical bars, while the outer vertical bars give the total uncertainties. The horizontal bars show the bin widths. The vertical shaded regions correspond to the $\mathrm {J}/\psi $ and $\psi '$ resonances. The horizontal shaded band shows the DHMV SM theoretical prediction [30,31]. The predictions from two other calculations are given in Table xxxxx.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Results of the measurement of $A_{FB}$ (left) and $F_{H}$ (right) in bins of $q^2$. The statistical uncertainties are shown by the inner vertical bars, while the outer vertical bars give the total uncertainties. The horizontal bars show the bin widths. The vertical shaded regions correspond to the $\mathrm {J}/\psi $ and $\psi '$ resonances. The horizontal shaded band shows the DHMV SM theoretical prediction [30,31]. The predictions from two other calculations are given in Table xxxxx.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Projections of the fit results from data for the ${\rm K}^+\mu ^+\mu ^-$ invariant mass distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Projections of the fit results from data for the ${\rm K}^+\mu ^+\mu ^-$ invariant mass distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Projections of the fit results from data for the ${\rm K}^+\mu ^+\mu ^-$ invariant mass distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
Projections of the fit results from data for the ${\rm K}^+\mu ^+\mu ^-$ invariant mass distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 4-d:
Projections of the fit results from data for the ${\rm K}^+\mu ^+\mu ^-$ invariant mass distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 4-e:
Projections of the fit results from data for the ${\rm K}^+\mu ^+\mu ^-$ invariant mass distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 4-f:
Projections of the fit results from data for the ${\rm K}^+\mu ^+\mu ^-$ invariant mass distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 4-g:
Projections of the fit results from data for the ${\rm K}^+\mu ^+\mu ^-$ invariant mass distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 4-h:
Projections of the fit results from data for the ${\rm K}^+\mu ^+\mu ^-$ invariant mass distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 4-i:
Projections of the fit results from data for the ${\rm K}^+\mu ^+\mu ^-$ invariant mass distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Projections of the fit results from data for $\cos(\theta _{\ell})$ distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Projections of the fit results from data for $\cos(\theta _{\ell})$ distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Projections of the fit results from data for $\cos(\theta _{\ell})$ distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
Projections of the fit results from data for $\cos(\theta _{\ell})$ distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
Projections of the fit results from data for $\cos(\theta _{\ell})$ distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 5-e:
Projections of the fit results from data for $\cos(\theta _{\ell})$ distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 5-f:
Projections of the fit results from data for $\cos(\theta _{\ell})$ distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 5-g:
Projections of the fit results from data for $\cos(\theta _{\ell})$ distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 5-h:
Projections of the fit results from data for $\cos(\theta _{\ell})$ distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.

png pdf
Figure 5-i:
Projections of the fit results from data for $\cos(\theta _{\ell})$ distributions for the $q^2$ bins given in each figure. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The lower plots show the pulls, the differences between the data and the fit results, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Systematic uncertainty contributions in the measurement of $A_{FB}$ for each $q^2$ bin.

png pdf
Table 2:
Systematic uncertainty contributions in the measurement of $F_{H}$ for each $q^2$ bin.
Summary
In summary, using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 20.5 fb$^{-1}$ recorded with the CMS detector at $\sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV, an angular analysis of the decay $\mathrm{B}^{+} \to \mathrm{K}^{+} \mu^+\mu^- $ has been performed. A measurement of the forward-backward asymmetry $A_{FB}$ of the muon system and the contribution $F_{H}$ of the pseudo-scalar, scalar, and tensor amplitudes to the decay width is reported as a function of the squared dimuon mass. The results are consistent with previous measurements and with various standard model predictions.
Additional Figures

png pdf
Additional Figure 1:
Spectrum of the dimuon invariant mass. The two peaks correspond to the $\mathrm {J}/\psi $ and $\psi '$ resonances used as control samples.

png pdf
Additional Figure 2:
The signal efficiency computed on simulated events along the angular variable $\cos\theta _{l}$ for the $q^{2}$ bin: 1.00-2.00 GeV/$c^{2}$.

png pdf
Additional Figure 3:
The signal efficiency computed on simulated events along the angular variable $\cos\theta _{l}$ for the $q^{2}$ bin: 2.00-4.30 GeV/$c^{2}$.

png pdf
Additional Figure 4:
The signal efficiency computed on simulated events along the angular variable $\cos\theta _{l}$ for the $q^{2}$ bin: 4.30-8.68 GeV/$c^{2}$.

png pdf
Additional Figure 5:
The signal efficiency computed on simulated events along the angular variable $\cos\theta _{l}$ for the $q^{2}$ bin: 10.09-12.86 GeV/$c^{2}$.

png pdf
Additional Figure 6:
The signal efficiency computed on simulated events along the angular variable $\cos\theta _{l}$ for the $q^{2}$ bin: 14.18-16.00 GeV/$c^{2}$.

png pdf
Additional Figure 7:
The signal efficiency computed on simulated events along the angular variable $\cos\theta _{l}$ for the $q^{2}$ bin: 16.00-18.00 GeV/$c^{2}$.

png pdf
Additional Figure 8:
The signal efficiency computed on simulated events along the angular variable $\cos\theta _{l}$ for the $q^{2}$ bin: 18.00-22.00 GeV/$c^{2}$.

png pdf
Additional Figure 9:
The signal efficiency computed on simulated events along the angular variable $\cos\theta _{l}$ for the $q^{2}$ bin: 1.00-6.00 GeV/$c^{2}$.

png pdf
Additional Figure 10:
The signal efficiency computed on simulated events along the angular variable $\cos\theta _{l}$ for the $q^{2}$ bin: 1.00-8.68, 10.09-12.86, and 14.18-22.00 GeV/$c^{2}$.

png pdf
Additional Figure 11:
Closure test of the fitting results of $A_{FB}$ for each $q^{2}$ bin on simulated data. The results of the fit on reconstructed events (blue dots) are compared with the fit on the generated events (green circles). The vertical shaded regions correspond to the $\mathrm {J}/\psi $ and $\psi '$ resonances.

png pdf
Additional Figure 12:
Closure test of the fitting results of $F_{H}$ for each $q^{2}$ bin on simulated data. The results of the fit on reconstructed events (blue dots) are compared with the fit on the generated events (green circles). The vertical shaded regions correspond to the $\mathrm {J}/\psi $ and $\psi '$ resonances.

png pdf
Additional Figure 13:
Measured values of the differential branching fraction in each of the $q^2$ bins from CMS, compared with standard model prediction [17] and LHCb [17,18] results.

png pdf
Additional Figure 14:
Measured values of $A_{FB}$ versus $q^2$ for $\mathrm {B}^{+}$ \to $\mathrm {K}^{+}$ \mu ^+\mu ^- from CMS, compared with LHCb [17,18] results. The statistical uncertainty is shown by the inner vertical bars, while the outer vertical bars give the total uncertainty. The horizontal bars show the bin widths. The vertical shaded regions correspond to the $\mathrm {J}/\psi $ and $\psi '$ resonances.

png pdf
Additional Figure 15:
Measured values of $F_{H}$ versus $q^2$ for $\mathrm {B}^{+}$ \to $\mathrm {K}^{+}$ \mu ^+\mu ^- from CMS, compared with LHCb [17,18] results. The statistical uncertainty is shown by the inner vertical bars, while the outer vertical bars give the total uncertainty. The horizontal bars show the bin widths. The vertical shaded regions correspond to the $\mathrm {J}/\psi $ and $\psi '$ resonances.
References
1 A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, and Y. M. Wang $ {\rm B} \rightarrow {\rm K} \ell^+ \ell^- $ decay at large hadronic recoil JHEP 02 (2013) 010 1211.0234
2 C. Bobeth, G. Hiller, and G. Piranishvili Angular distributions of $ {\rm B} \rightarrow {\rm K} \ell^+ \ell^- $ decays JHEP 12 (2007) 040 0709.4174
3 A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A. A. Pivovarov, and Y. M. Wang Charm-loop effect in $ {\rm B} \to {\rm K}^{(*)} \ell^{+} \ell^{-} $ and $ {\rm B} \to {\rm K}^* \gamma $ JHEP 09 (2010) 089 1006.4945
4 C. Bobeth, G. Hiller, D. van Dyk, and C. Wacker The decay $ {\rm B} \to {\rm K} \ell^+ \ell^- $ at low hadronic recoil and model-independent $ \Delta B = $ 1 constraints JHEP 01 (2012) 107 1111.2558
5 A. Ali, T. Mannel, and T. Morozumi Forward-backward asymmetry of dilepton angular distribution in the decay $ {\rm b} \to {\rm s} \ell^+ \ell^- $ PLB 273 (1991) 505
6 F. Beaujean, C. Bobeth, and S. Jahn Constraints on tensor and scalar couplings from $ {\rm B} \rightarrow {\rm K} \bar{\mu} \mu $ and $ {\rm B}_s \rightarrow \bar{\mu} \mu $ EPJC 75 (2015) 456 1508.01526
7 W. Altmannshofer, C. Niehoff, P. Stangl, and D. M. Straub Status of the $ {\rm B} \rightarrow {\rm K}^{*} \mu^{+} \mu^{-} $ anomaly after Moriond 2017 EPJC 77 (2017) 377 1703.09189
8 W. Altmannshofer, P. Paradisi, and D. M. Straub Model-independent constraints on new physics in $ b \rightarrow s $ transitions JHEP 04 (2012) 008 1111.1257
9 F. Sala and D. M. Straub A new light particle in B decays? PLB 774 (2017) 205 1704.06188
10 W. Altmannshofer and D. M. Straub New physics in $ b \rightarrow s $ transitions after LHC run 1 EPJC 75 (2015) 382 1411.3161
11 A. K. Alok, A. Dighe, and S. U. Sankar Large forward-backward asymmetry in $ {\rm B} {\rightarrow} {\rm K} {{\mu}}^{+} {{\mu}}^{{-}} $ from new physics tensor operators PRD 78 (2008) 114025 0810.3779
12 D. Ghosh, M. Nardecchia, and S. A. Renner Hint of lepton flavour non-universality in B meson decays JHEP 12 (2014) 131 1408.4097
13 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity based on pixel cluster counting --- Summer 2013 update CMS-PAS-LUM-13-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-13-001
14 BABAR Collaboration Measurements of branching fractions, rate asymmetries, and angular distributions in the rare decays $ {\rm B} \rightarrow {\rm K} \ell^+ \ell^- $ and $ {\rm B} \rightarrow {\rm K}^{\ast} \ell^+ \ell^- $ PRD 73 (2006) 092001 hep-ex/0604007
15 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the differential branching fraction and forward-backword asymmetry for $ {\rm B} \rightarrow {\rm K}^{(\ast)} \ell^+ \ell^- $ PRL 103 (2009) 171801 0904.0770
16 CDF Collaboration Measurements of the angular distributions in the decays $ {\rm B} \rightarrow {\rm K}^{(\ast)} \mu^+ \mu^- $ at CDF PRL 108 (2012) 081807 1108.0695
17 LHCb Collaboration Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the $ {\rm B}^+ \rightarrow {\rm K}^+ \mu^+ \mu^- $ decay JHEP 02 (2013) 105 1209.4284
18 LHCb Collaboration Angular analysis of charged and neutral $ {\rm B} \rightarrow {\rm K} \mu^+ \mu^- $ decays JHEP 05 (2014) 082 1403.8045
19 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
20 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
21 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comp. Phys. Commu. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
22 D. J. Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package NIMA 462 (2001) 152
23 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4 --- a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
24 CMS Collaboration Performance of muon identification in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV CDS
25 CMS Collaboration Muon ID performance: low-$ p_{\rm{T}} $ muon efficiencies CDS
26 Particle Data Group, C. Patrignani et al. Review of Particle Physics CPC 40 (2016) 100001
27 A. Ali, P. Ball, L. T. Handoko, and G. Hiller A comparative study of the decays $ {\rm B} \rightarrow {\rm K}^{(\ast)} \ell^+ \ell^- $ in standard model and supersymmetric theories PRD 61 (2000) 074024 hep-ph/9910221
28 C. Bobeth, T. Ewerth, F. Kruger, and J. Urban Analysis of neutral Higgs-boson contributions to the decays $ {\rm B}_s \rightarrow \ell^+ \ell^- $ and $ {\rm B} \rightarrow {\rm K} \ell^+ \ell^- $ PRD 64 (2001) 074014 hep-ph/0104284
29 G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins A unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals PRD 57 (1998) 3873 physics/9711021
30 S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias, and J. Virto On the impact of power corrections in the prediction of $ {\rm B} \to {\rm K}^* \mu^+ \mu^- $ observables JHEP 12 (2014) 125 1407.8526
31 S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias, and J. Virto Global analysis of $ {\rm b}\to {\rm s} \ell \ell $ anomalies JHEP 06 (2016) 092 1510.04239
32 D. van Dyk, C. Bobeth, F. Beaujean, and T. Blake EOS (lambda-polarised release) 2017
33 HPQCD Collaboration Rare decay $ {\rm B} \to {\rm K} \ell^+ \ell^- $ form factors from lattice QCD PRD 88 (2013) 054509 1306.2384
34 P. Ball and R. Zwicky New results on $ {\rm B} {\rightarrow} {\pi}, {\rm K}, {\eta} $ decay form factors from light-cone sum rules PRD 71 (2005) 014015 hep-ph/0406232
35 D. Straub et al. flav-io/flavio v0.15.1 2016
36 Fermilab Lattice and MILC Collaboration $ {\rm B} \to {\rm K} \ell^ + \ell^- $ decay form factors from three-flavor lattice QCD PRD 93 (2016) 025 1509.06235
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN