Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js
CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-SMP-15-008
Measurements of the ppW±γγ and ppZγγ cross sections and limits on dimension-8 effective anomalous gauge couplings at s= 8 TeV
Abstract: We present measurements of the cross sections of the ppW±γγ and ppZγγ final states in the channels where the W boson decays to muons and Z boson decays to electrons or muons. The measurement uses 19.4 fb1 of 8 TeV data collected with the CMS experiment in 2012. We observe the signal for W±γγ with a significance of 2.4σ and we observe the Zγγ signal with a significance of 5.9σ. Upper limits are placed on anomalous quartic gauge couplings using the W±γγ final state, with particular sensitivity to the fT,0 coupling. The observed 95% confidence level limit on the fT,0 coupling is 37.5<fT,0Λ4<38.1.
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Representative diagrams for W±γγ (a-c) and Zγγ (d,e) production. In diagram (a) one photon originates as ISR and the other as FSR. In diagram (b) one photon results from ISR while the other participates in a TGC vertex. In diagram (c) both photons originate from a QGC vertex. The QGC vertex is of particular interest in this analysis because its strength can be enhanced by new physics. In diagram (d) Zγγ production is shown with one ISR photon radiated from an incoming quark and one FSR photon from a Z decay lepton. In diagram (e) both photons are produced through ISR. The ZZγ, Zγγ and ZZγγ vertices are not allowed in the SM.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Representative diagrams for W±γγ (a-c) and Zγγ (d,e) production. In diagram (a) one photon originates as ISR and the other as FSR. In diagram (b) one photon results from ISR while the other participates in a TGC vertex. In diagram (c) both photons originate from a QGC vertex. The QGC vertex is of particular interest in this analysis because its strength can be enhanced by new physics. In diagram (d) Zγγ production is shown with one ISR photon radiated from an incoming quark and one FSR photon from a Z decay lepton. In diagram (e) both photons are produced through ISR. The ZZγ, Zγγ and ZZγγ vertices are not allowed in the SM.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Representative diagrams for W±γγ (a-c) and Zγγ (d,e) production. In diagram (a) one photon originates as ISR and the other as FSR. In diagram (b) one photon results from ISR while the other participates in a TGC vertex. In diagram (c) both photons originate from a QGC vertex. The QGC vertex is of particular interest in this analysis because its strength can be enhanced by new physics. In diagram (d) Zγγ production is shown with one ISR photon radiated from an incoming quark and one FSR photon from a Z decay lepton. In diagram (e) both photons are produced through ISR. The ZZγ, Zγγ and ZZγγ vertices are not allowed in the SM.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
Representative diagrams for W±γγ (a-c) and Zγγ (d,e) production. In diagram (a) one photon originates as ISR and the other as FSR. In diagram (b) one photon results from ISR while the other participates in a TGC vertex. In diagram (c) both photons originate from a QGC vertex. The QGC vertex is of particular interest in this analysis because its strength can be enhanced by new physics. In diagram (d) Zγγ production is shown with one ISR photon radiated from an incoming quark and one FSR photon from a Z decay lepton. In diagram (e) both photons are produced through ISR. The ZZγ, Zγγ and ZZγγ vertices are not allowed in the SM.

png pdf
Figure 1-e:
Representative diagrams for W±γγ (a-c) and Zγγ (d,e) production. In diagram (a) one photon originates as ISR and the other as FSR. In diagram (b) one photon results from ISR while the other participates in a TGC vertex. In diagram (c) both photons originate from a QGC vertex. The QGC vertex is of particular interest in this analysis because its strength can be enhanced by new physics. In diagram (d) Zγγ production is shown with one ISR photon radiated from an incoming quark and one FSR photon from a Z decay lepton. In diagram (e) both photons are produced through ISR. The ZZγ, Zγγ and ZZγγ vertices are not allowed in the SM.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Validation of the data-driven estimates of misidentified jets signal-like events that have 15 GeV <psubleadT< 25 GeV. The misidentified jet contribution is estimated using data-driven techniques. The W±γγ, Zγγ, and other multiboson contributions are given by simulation. The hatched area represents the combined uncertainty from all background sources.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The pT of the diphoton system for the W±γγ analysis. The jet misidentification background contribution is determined from data-driven methods. The Zγγ and other multiboson contributions are estimated using simulation and are normalized to their production cross section. The hatched band represents the total uncertainty of all background sources, combined in quadrature. The last bin includes all events having pγγT> 80 GeV, but the normalization is to the displayed bin width.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The pT of the diphoton system in the muon (left) and electron (right) channels for the Zγγ analysis. The jet misidentification background contributions are determined from a data-driven estimate. The other multiboson background contributions are estimated using simulation and are normalized to their production cross section. The hatched band represents the total uncertainty of all background sources, combined in quadrature. The last bin includes all events having pγγT> 80 GeV, but the normalization is to the displayed bin width.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The pT of the diphoton system in the muon (left) and electron (right) channels for the Zγγ analysis. The jet misidentification background contributions are determined from a data-driven estimate. The other multiboson background contributions are estimated using simulation and are normalized to their production cross section. The hatched band represents the total uncertainty of all background sources, combined in quadrature. The last bin includes all events having pγγT> 80 GeV, but the normalization is to the displayed bin width.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Observed data with predicted background contributions, expected SM W±γγ signal and the contribution from an aQGC where the fT,0 parameter is 50 TeV4 (dashed line).

png pdf
Figure 6:
Scan of the negative log likelihood ratio as a function of the fT0 parameter. The expected distribution is shown in black and the observed in red. The 1σ and 2σ exclusion levels are shown in green and yellow. The shape of the likelihood ratio for the observed data is a result of a small excess of observed data over the SM prediction. The excess does not exclude the SM at the 68% confidence level, but the observed limits become somewhat weaker than the expected limits.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Number of predicted background events compared to the observed data and expected signal for the Wγγ analysis, having photons with pT> 25 GeV. The results are presented separately in each region and also as the sum over the regions. The background contributions are summed in the 'Total Background' column with the correlations between various components of the uncertainties combined appropriately. The signal prediction is given by the nominal signal simulation sample normalized to the recorded luminosity.

png pdf
Table 2:
Number of predicted background events compared to the observed data and expected signal for the Zγγ analysis, having photons with pT> 15 GeV. The results are presented separately in each region and also as the sum over the regions. The background contributions are summed in the 'Total Background' column with the correlations between various components of the uncertainties combined appropriately. The signal prediction is given by the nominal signal simulation sample normalized to the recorded luminosity.

png pdf
Table 3:
Fiducial definitions for the Wγγ analysis (top) and Zγγ analysis (bottom). Leptons are dressed such that the four-momenta of photons within a cone of ΔR< 0.1 are added to the four-momentum of the lepton.

png pdf
Table 4:
Fiducial acceptance for the Wγγ and Zγγ analyses. The acceptances are the ratios of reconstructed events passing the analysis selection criteria to Monte Carlo ``Truth'' events passing each analysis's fiducial definition. The removal of τ decays is accomplished by dividing by the fraction of events that do not contain a τ decay, (1fτ).

png pdf
Table 5:
Systematic and statistical uncertainties affecting the Wγγ fiducial cross section for events with a leading photon having pT> 25 GeV.

png pdf
Table 6:
Systematic and statistical uncertainties affecting the Zγγ fiducial cross section for events with a leading photon having pT> 15 GeV.

png pdf
Table 7:
95% exclusion limits on the anomalous couplings.
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN