Processing math: 15%
CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-HIN-20-002 ; CERN-EP-2023-294
Elliptic anisotropy measurement of the f0(980) hadron in proton-lead collisions and evidence for its quark-antiquark composition
Accepted for publication in Nature Physics
Abstract: Despite the f0(980) hadron having been discovered half a century ago, the question about its quark content has not been settled: it might be an ordinary quark-antiquark (qˉq) meson, a tetraquark (qˉqqˉq) exotic state, a kaon-antikaon (K¯K) molecule, or a quark-antiquark-gluon (qˉqg) hybrid. This paper reports strong evidence that the f0(980) state is an ordinary qˉq meson, inferred from the scaling of elliptic anisotropies (v2) with the number of constituent quarks (nq), as empirically established using conventional hadrons in relativistic heavy ion collisions. The f0(980) state is reconstructed via its dominant decay channel f0(980)π+π, in proton-lead collisions recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC, and its v2 is measured as a function of transverse momentum (pT). It is found that the nq= 2 (qˉq state) hypothesis is favored over nq= 4 (qˉqqˉq or K¯K states) by 7.7, 6.3, or 3.1 standard deviations in the pT< 10, 8, or 6 GeV/c ranges, respectively, and over nq= 3 (qˉqg hybrid state) by 3.5 standard deviations in the pT< 8 GeV/c range. This result represents the first determination of the quark content of the f0(980) state, made possible by using a novel approach, and paves the way for similar studies of other exotic hadron candidates.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Coalescence hadronization. This picture illustrates the formation of hadrons in heavy ion collisions in the coalescence model. Hadrons tend to form when the constituent quarks have similar positions and momenta.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Elliptic anisotropy results. The nonflow-effect-subtracted elliptic anisotropy vsub2 of the f0(980) is shown as a function of pT within |y| 2.4 in high-multiplicity \mathrm{p}\mathrm{Pb} collisions. The error bars show statistical uncertainties while the shaded areas represent systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 3:
NCQ scaling of elliptic anisotropy. The v_2^{\text{sub}}/n_{\mathrm{q}} of the f_0(980) state (for the n_{\mathrm{q}}= 2 and 4 hypotheses) as a function of KE_{\text T}/n_{\mathrm{q}} , compared with those of \mathrm{K^0_S} , \Lambda , \Xi^{-} , and \Omega strange hadrons [50] in high-multiplicity \mathrm{p}\mathrm{Pb} collisions. The error bars show statistical uncertainties while the shaded areas represent systematic uncertainties. The red curve is the NCQ scaling parameterization of the data for \mathrm{K^0_S} , \Lambda , \Xi^{-} , and \Omega hadrons given by Eq. \eqrefequ:ncq.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Exclusion significance from n_{\mathrm{q}}= 4. The log-likelihood ratio distributions for the n_{\mathrm{q}}= 2 and 4 hypotheses from pseudo-experiments, together with the measured value for the f_0(980) state in the 0 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 10 GeV/c range.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Invariant mass fit. The invariant mass spectrum of opposite-sign pion pairs after the combinatorial background subtraction, for the pair transverse momentum 4 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 6 GeV/c and the azimuthal angle 0 < \phi-\psi_{2} < \pi/ 12, in high-multiplicity \mathrm{p}\mathrm{Pb} collisions. The solid blue curve is the fit result within the fit range marked with vertical blue dashed lines; the orange dashed curve represents the residual background. The solid red curve represents the f_0(980) signal, while the dashed dark-violet and light-green curves correspond to the background contributions from the \rho(770)^0 and f_2(1270) resonances, respectively. The ratio between data and the fit result is shown in the lower panel, with the error bars representing statistical uncertainties only. The low-mass region exhibits a nontrivial turn-on behavior and is not included in the fit.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Extraction of the elliptic anisotropy v_{2} parameter. The f_0(980) yield in the 4 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 6 GeV/c range as a function of \phi-\psi_{2} in high-multiplicity \mathrm{p}\mathrm{Pb} collisions. Error bars show statistical uncertainties. The red curve is a fit to Eq. (1) with only the n= 2 term.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Elliptic anisotropy before the nonflow effect subtraction. The elliptic anisotropy v_{2} of the f_0(980) state is shown as a function of p_{\mathrm{T}} within rapidity |y| \lesssim 2.4 in high-multiplicity \mathrm{p}\mathrm{Pb} collisions. The error bars show statistical uncertainties while the shaded areas represent systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 8:
NCQ scaling of elliptic anisotropy in p_{\mathrm{T}}/n_{\mathrm{q}} .} The v_2^{\text{sub}}/n_{\mathrm{q}} of the f_0(980) state (for the n_{\mathrm{q}}= 2 and 4 hypotheses) as a function of p_{\mathrm{T}}/n_{\mathrm{q}} is compared with those of the \mathrm{K^0_S} , \Lambda , \Xi^{-} , and \Omega strange hadrons \protect [50] in high-multiplicity \mathrm{p}\mathrm{Pb} collisions. Error bars show the statistical uncertainties while the shaded areas represent systematic uncertainties. The red curve is the NCQ scaling parameterization of the data for the \mathrm{K^0_S} , \Lambda , \Xi^{-} , and \Omega hadrons.

png pdf
Figure 9:
The \chi^2 scan.} The \chi^2 of the f_0(980) elliptic flow data with respect to the NCQ scaling parameterization, scanned in steps of n_\mathrm{q} . The three curves correspond to using f_0(980) data for p_{\mathrm{T}} < 6, 8, and 10 GeV/c, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Exclusion significances for n_{\mathrm{q}}= 4.} Same as Fig. 4 but using \mathrm{f}_0(980) v_2^{\text{sub}} data within the restricted ranges p_{\mathrm{T}} < 8 GeV/c (upper) and p_{\mathrm{T}} < 6 GeV/c (lower).

png pdf
Figure 10-a:
Exclusion significances for n_{\mathrm{q}}= 4.} Same as Fig. 4 but using \mathrm{f}_0(980) v_2^{\text{sub}} data within the restricted ranges p_{\mathrm{T}} < 8 GeV/c (upper) and p_{\mathrm{T}} < 6 GeV/c (lower).

png pdf
Figure 10-b:
Exclusion significances for n_{\mathrm{q}}= 4.} Same as Fig. 4 but using \mathrm{f}_0(980) v_2^{\text{sub}} data within the restricted ranges p_{\mathrm{T}} < 8 GeV/c (upper) and p_{\mathrm{T}} < 6 GeV/c (lower).

png pdf
Figure 11:
Exclusion significance for n_{\mathrm{q}}= 3.} The expected log-likelihood ratio distributions for n_{\mathrm{q}}= 2 vs.\ 3 hypotheses from the pseudo-experiments and the observed value for the f_0(980) in data in the p_{\mathrm{T}} < 8 GeV/c range.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Sources and magnitudes of the uncertainties in the extracted n_{\mathrm{q}} of the f_0(980) state in the range p_{\mathrm{T}} < 10 GeV/c.
Summary
The f_0(980) state is observed in the \pi^{+}\pi^{-} invariant mass distribution of high-multiplicity proton-lead collisions at \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}}= 8.16 TeV, using data collected by the CMS experiment in 2016 and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 186\,\text{nb}^{-1}. The elliptic flow anisotropy v_{2} of the f_0(980) state is measured as a function of p_{\mathrm{T}} up to 10 GeV/c, with respect to the second-order harmonic plane reconstructed from forward/backward energy flow. After subtracting the nonflow contamination, evaluated from \mathrm{K^0_S} measurements, we obtain the corrected v_2^{\text{sub}} observable. By comparing the \mathrm{f}_0(980) v_2^{\text{sub}} to those of \mathrm{K^0_S} , \Lambda , \Xi^{-} , and \Omega under the number-of-constituent-quarks scaling hypothesis, we rule out the hypotheses that the f_0(980) is a tetraquark state or a {\mathrm{K}\overline{\mathrm{K}}} molecule, in favor of an ordinary \mathrm{q}\bar{\mathrm{q}} meson hypothesis, at 7.7 standard deviations (6.3 or 3.1 standard deviations, respectively, if only a restricted range of p_{\mathrm{T}} < 8 or 6 GeV/c is considered). The f_0(980) data in the p_{\mathrm{T}} < 8 GeV/c range are found to disfavor a quark-antiquark-gluon hybrid state at 3.5 standard deviations. The number of constituent quarks of the f_0(980) state, as extracted from a fit to the v_2^{\text{sub}} data, is consistent with the value of 2, characteristic of an ordinary meson. Consequently, we find strong evidence that the f_0(980) hadron is a normal quark-antiquark state. We believe that the results reported in this paper present a clear solution to a half-a-century-old puzzle. The experimental determination of the quark content of the f_0(980) state with high confidence, using this novel approach, is expected to stimulate further experimental investigations as well as theoretical studies. It paves the way for studies of other exotic hadron candidates using the collective flow scaling approach in high-multiplicity proton-nucleus and heavy ion collisions.
References
1 M. Gell-Mann A schematic model of baryons and mesons PL 8 (1964) 214
2 G. Zweig An SU _3 model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking; Version 2 Developments in the Quark Theory of Hadrons. Vol. 1. 1964-1978
link
3 R. L. Jaffe Perhaps a stable dihyperon PRL 38 (1977) 195
4 R. L. Jaffe Exotica Phys. Rept. 409 (2005) 1 hep-ph/0409065
5 Belle Collaboration Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B^\pm \to K^\pm \pi^+ \pi^- J/\psi decays PRL 91 (2003) 262001 hep-ex/0309032
6 LHCb Collaboration Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark Nature Phys. 18 (2022) 751 2109.01038
7 A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa Multiquark resonances Phys. Rept. 668 (2017) 1 1611.07920
8 S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, and D. Zieminska Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: experimental evidence Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 015003 1708.04012
9 S. D. Protopopescu et al. \pi\pi partial wave analysis from reactions \pi^+ p \to \pi^+ \pi^- \Delta^{++} and \pi^+ p \to K^+ K^- \Delta^{++} at 7.1 GeVc PRD 7 (1973) 1279
10 B. Hyams et al. \pi\pi phase shift analysis from 600 to 1900 MeV NPB 64 (1973) 134
11 G. Grayer et al. High statistics study of the reaction \pi^- p \to \pi^-\pi^+ n : apparatus, method of analysis, and general features of results at 17 GeVc NPB 75 (1974) 189
12 R. L. Jaffe Multi-quark hadrons. 1. phenomenology of ( Q^2{\bar Q}^2 ) mesons PRD 15 (1977) 267
13 J. D. Weinstein and N. Isgur \mathrm{K}\overline{\mathrm{K}} molecules PRD 41 (1990) 2236
14 C. Amsler and N. A. Tornqvist Mesons beyond the naive quark model Phys. Rept. 389 (2004) 61
15 D. V. Bugg Four sorts of meson Phys. Rept. 397 (2004) 257 hep-ex/0412045
16 E. Klempt and A. Zaitsev Glueballs, hybrids, multiquarks. experimental facts versus QCD inspired concepts Phys. Rept. 454 (2007) 1 0708.4016
17 A. Deandrea et al. The \mathrm{s}\overline{\mathrm{s}} and \mathrm{K}\overline{\mathrm{K}} nature of f_0(980) in \mathrm{D}_{s} decays PLB 502 (2001) 79 hep-ph/0012120
18 Particle Data Group Collaboration Review of Particle Physics PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01
19 CMS Collaboration Evidence for \HepParticleResonanceX3872 in Pb-Pb collisions and studies of its prompt production at \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}}= 5.02 TeV PRL 128 (2022) 032001 CMS-HIN-19-005
2102.13048
20 S. T. Butler and C. A. Pearson Deuterons from high-energy proton bombardment of matter PR 129 (1963) 836
21 C. B. Dover, U. W. Heinz, E. Schnedermann, and J. Zimanyi Relativistic coalescence model for high-energy nuclear collisions Phys. Rev. C 44 (1991) 1636
22 R. J. Fries, V. Greco, and P. Sorensen Coalescence models for hadron formation from quark gluon plasma Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 58 (2008) 177 0807.4939
23 R. C. Hwa and C. B. Yang Scaling behavior at high p_{\mathrm{T}} and the p/ \pi ratio Phys. Rev. C 67 (2003) 034902 nucl-th/0211010
24 R. J. Fries, B. Muller, C. Nonaka, and S. A. Bass Hadronization in heavy ion collisions: recombination and fragmentation of partons PRL 90 (2003) 202303 nucl-th/0301087
25 V. Greco, C. M. Ko, and P. Levai Parton coalescence and the antiproton/pion anomaly at RHIC PRL 90 (2003) 202302 nucl-th/0301093
26 J.-Y. Ollitrault Anisotropy as a signature of transverse collective flow PRD 46 (1992) 229
27 CMS Collaboration Observation of long-range near-side angular correlations in proton-proton collisions at the LHC JHEP 09 (2010) 091 CMS-QCD-10-002
1009.4122
28 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of long-range elliptic azimuthal anisotropies in \sqrt{s}= 13 and 2.76 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector PRL 116 (2016) 172301 1509.04776
29 CMS Collaboration Measurement of long-range near-side two-particle angular correlations in pp collisions at \sqrt{s} = 13 TeV PRL 116 (2016) 172302 CMS-FSQ-15-002
1510.03068
30 CMS Collaboration Evidence for collectivity in pp collisions at the LHC PLB 765 (2017) 193 CMS-HIN-16-010
1606.06198
31 CMS Collaboration Observation of long-range near-side angular correlations in proton-lead collisions at the LHC PLB 718 (2013) 795 CMS-HIN-12-015
1210.5482
32 ALICE Collaboration Long-range angular correlations on the near and away side in \mathrm{p}\mathrm{Pb} collisions at \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}}= 5.02 TeV PLB 719 (2013) 29 1212.2001
33 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of associated near-side and away-side long-range correlations in \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}}= 5.02 TeV proton-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector PRL 110 (2013) 182302 1212.5198
34 CMS Collaboration Multiplicity and transverse momentum dependence of two- and four-particle correlations in \mathrm{p}\mathrm{Pb} and PbPb collisions PLB 724 (2013) 213 CMS-HIN-13-002
1305.0609
35 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of long-range pseudorapidity correlations and azimuthal harmonics in \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}}= 5.02 TeV proton-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector Phys. Rev. C 90 (2014) 044906 1409.1792
36 CMS Collaboration Long-range two-particle correlations of strange hadrons with charged particles in \mathrm{p}\mathrm{Pb} and PbPb collisions at LHC energies PLB 742 (2015) 200 CMS-HIN-14-002
1409.3392
37 CMS Collaboration Evidence for collective multiparticle correlations in \mathrm{p}\mathrm{Pb} collisions PRL 115 (2015) 012301 CMS-HIN-14-006
1502.05382
38 LHCb Collaboration Measurements of long-range near-side angular correlations in \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}}= 5 TeV proton-lead collisions in the forward region PLB 762 (2016) 473 1512.00439
39 A. Gu, T. Edmonds, J. Zhao, and F. Wang Elliptical flow coalescence to identify the f_0(980) content Phys. Rev. C 101 (2020) 024908 1902.07152
40 A. M. Poskanzer and S. A. Voloshin Methods for analyzing anisotropic flow in relativistic nuclear collisions Phys. Rev. C 58 (1998) 1671 nucl-ex/9805001
41 D. Molnar and S. A. Voloshin Elliptic flow at large transverse momenta from quark coalescence PRL 91 (2003) 092301 nucl-th/0302014
42 L. Maiani, A. D. Polosa, V. Riquer, and C. A. Salgado Counting valence quarks at RHIC and LHC PLB 645 (2007) hep-ph/0606217
43 ExHIC Collaboration Multi-quark hadrons from heavy ion collisions PRL 106 (2011) 212001 1011.0852
44 A. Gu and F. Wang Transverse momentum spectra of f_0(980) from coalescence model PLB 848 (2024) 138399 2306.08584
45 ALICE Collaboration Observation of abnormal suppression of f_0(980) production in \mathrm{p}\mathrm{Pb} collisions at \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = 5.02 TeV 2311.11786
46 STAR Collaboration Particle type dependence of azimuthal anisotropy and nuclear modification of particle production in Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = 200 GeV PRL 92 (2004) 052302 nucl-ex/0306007
47 PHENIX Collaboration Scaling properties of azimuthal anisotropy in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = 200 GeV PRL 98 (2007) 162301 nucl-ex/0608033
48 ALICE Collaboration Elliptic flow of identified hadrons in Pb-Pb collisions at \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}}= 2.76 TeV JHEP 06 (2015) 190 1405.4632
49 ALICE Collaboration Anisotropic flow of identified particles in Pb-Pb collisions at \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}}= 5.02 TeV JHEP 09 (2018) 006 1805.04390
50 CMS Collaboration Elliptic flow of charm and strange hadrons in high-multiplicity \mathrm{p}\mathrm{Pb} collisions at \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = 8.16 TeV PRL 121 (2018) 082301 CMS-HIN-17-003
1804.09767
51 CMS Collaboration HEPData record for this analysis link
52 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
53 CMS Collaboration Strategies and performance of the CMS silicon tracker alignment during LHC Run 2 NIM A 1037 (2022) 166795 CMS-TRK-20-001
2111.08757
54 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s} = 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
55 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
56 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
57 CMS Collaboration Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3 Accepted by JINST, 2023 CMS-PRF-21-001
2309.05466
58 CMS Collaboration Observation of correlated azimuthal anisotropy Fourier harmonics in pp and p+Pb collisions at the LHC PRL 120 (2018) 092301 CMS-HIN-16-022
1709.09189
59 V. Weisskopf and E. P. Wigner Berechnung der nat\"urlichen linienbreite auf grund der Diracschen lichttheorie Z. Phys. 63 (1930) 54
60 CMSnoop Coulomb wave functions \hrefM.~H. Hull and G.~Breit, , . Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1959
link
61 STAR Collaboration \rho^0 production and possible modification in Au+Au and p+p collisions at \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = 200 GeV PRL 92 (2004) 092301 nucl-ex/0307023
62 STAR Collaboration NCQ scaling of f_0(980) elliptic flow in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions by STAR and its constituent quark content Eur. Phys. J. Web Conf. 259 (2022) 10013 2202.01618
63 M. Gyulassy and X.-N. Wang HIJING 1.0: A Monte Carlo program for parton and particle production in high-energy hadronic and nuclear collisions Comput. Phys. Commun. 83 (1994) 307 nucl-th/9502021
64 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
65 P. T. Matthews and A. Salam Relativistic theory of unstable particles. II PR 115 (1959) 1079
66 R. A. Kycia and S. Jadach Relativistic Voigt profile for unstable particles in high energy physics J. Math. Anal. Appl. 463 (2018) 1040 1711.09304
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN